Pac vs Marquez III - In Pics, who's more convincing?

:rofl

 

so now i have 3 *****s to play with.

 

Omg is he being serious right now?

 

you thought i was ever serious with my first response to bladegunner? atsch

 

Problem is though, there seems to be more trolls than there are people who just want to discuss boxing in an amicable manner, especially where Pacquiao is concerned, which defeats the purpose. Starting to wonder what the point of posting in the GF is. :think
You destroy their arguments and they make another thread saying the exact same things. atsch

I mean, ****, there's still *******s here talking about 'foot stomping' and Marquez having 'denser muscles' for this fight, despite plenty of evidence to the contrary.

Waste of time.

 

This content is protected

:good

 

:rofl I feel you on this man. Especially when you kill their argument and they make a new thread saying the same ****

 

This content is protected

Marquez saying school is in session.

 

This content is protected

Marquez saying school is in session again.

 

Most assumed *******s are simply pointing out that it was a close fight that could have gone either way. It is not very hard to make a case for that at all.

The comeback; "I killed your argument", "you dont know anything about boxing", "you are not a fan of the sport, just of a single boxer", are really just standard ESB-comments, if you think of it.

 

I think the problem is that "you think" you're destroying their arguments. I could say that JMM hardly did anything in the championship rounds and you would probably go on some tangent about ring generalship blah blah blah which don't prove **** while meanwhile there's some guy posting gifs of Pac landing cleanly and outboxing JMM in rounds 11 and 12. I could say that JMM's footstomps looks more choreographed than Pac's due to his toes being up all the time and you'd probably dismiss it too as Pac doing the same thing which clearly isnt the same thing. See? It doesn't matter how much logic or reason someone could present to you...you'd just come up with something that doesn't prove **** and call it you "killing" their arguement.

 

In an amicable mannered boxing debate it ought to be relevant what actually went down during the rounds. Gifs are showing excacly that.

 

Have you seen the irrational and pathetic threads these *******s have made. They'll talk about foot stomping, Pacquiao's hair, cramps, bruising all types of crap.
We even got some *******s claiming Juan was on roids atsch

and they'll make the same threads over and over

 

That was his point, you can't determine a winner based of what their faces looked like afterwards.

JMM definitely won this fight, the clearest victory of the trilogy IMHO.

 

Welcome to the Internet, mate.

I dont think Marquez assumed foot stomping affected the fight even one bit, but I have to say it looked a little bit suspicious. An old fox like him ought to know a trick or two like that. It would not be boxing without it