Pac vs Marquez III - In Pics, who's more convincing?

38 year old lightweight scar and damaged tissue.

 

No, I am not. You are asking me to answer a question for Pac. I told you, I don't play those games, because that's not Pac's answer.

 

Would you apply this same logic to a 33 year old lightweight with a similar history of cutting and bruising who supposedly gotten hit with cleaner and more effective punches? Objective much?

 

D'oh!!

 

Marquez face vs Katsidis

This content is protected

Marquez face vs Juan Diaz

This content is protected

Marquez face vs Casamayor

This content is protected

Holy ****!!! According to *******s Marquez hasnt won a fight in 3 years.

 

Slow yor roll *****. You quoted my post...but did you actually address it? Did you actually prove a point by posting these pics of JMM? Reread what you quoted...read it slowly and think really hard, ya know...the critical thinking kinda hard and get back to me with something with more depth.

 

Dont tell me to think critical *******. I'll have your ***** ass come over here and be my leg rest.



No where in boxing history does it state you score fights by who got bruised more. YOu ****ing dummy!

 

**** are guys really this thick? The original point was whether you would give the same benefit of the doubt to Pac being that he also has a history of bruising and swelling from as far back as the Agapito fight. Of course you won't....coz you're a dumbass who can't even argue the original point at hand.

 

and yet it has ended up with dilusional pacroid ***gots trolling the thread, like always. your boyfriend got beat, admit it. PS, iM not a JMM fan either. Im all about some sexy sergio!

 

Way to totally miss the point. I suggest you think it over.

And your "I'm better than you..." retort is ironic.


Or maybe you really are just too thick.