Anyway. My vote is Macklin v Barker. With the right hype I think it could be a terrific fight and really well appreciated. It should've happened by now anyway. True.
It's too late now, but Hatton vs Khan in Man City's stadium would have been a massive fight in the UK. More for the casual fans than the hardcores, but that isn't always a bad thing. A cult hero returns, a new star emerges, a torch is passed, a cheesy marketing blitz, massive income and interest would be generated. Haye vs Fury on Channel 5 would also be huge. Fury would get destroyed though.
Khan - Mayweather at Wembley on Box Nation. Everybody would sign up and we'd benefit for a long time to come.
Fight to make the Boxing Business stronger or the fight to make Boxnation stronger ? I like Burns v Mitchell Macklin v Barker ON same bill Scot Vs England Bill Burns v Mitchell Anderson vs Groves same bill
He is nothing more than a world class who lost rounds to fighters like Chris John and Katsidis. Nothing special. Nothing Burns is not ready for. It wouldn't be a one-sided loss for Burns, that is for sure.
I don't think Marquez-Burns would be that one sided, it's definately a good fight. I'd favour Marquez to win but definately wouldn't right Burns off.
No, I wouldn't right him off. I would write him off though. PS. How come everyone has a problem when I make mistakes with grammar or spelling? It's destroying my self-confidence.... :sad2
Froch v Cleverly, Good homecoming fight for Froch and a chance to win a belt in a second weight division, for Cleverly its a real tough fight and a chance to prove his worth as a belt holder, I also think the styles match up nicely.