Amir Khan Interview Shutdown during Steroid Questioning [STRANGE VIDEO]

Even if they give one of the points back to Khan, the fight becomes a draw.

Khan will get his belts back.

I think they will call for an immediate rematch, which would be fair with all the uncommon stuff going on.

 

The post-fight goings-on have been far more interesting than the fight itself.

Who is "Hatman"? :think clearly a sinister agent or shadowy underground mob guy imo

 

I'm confused too, mate. I had no idea about this master scoring stuff, either. And yes, what about that Columbia Commision scoresheet? What happens to that? **** knows.

The thing is, Khan and Schaefer could be suggesting, I think, the possibility that Walsh logged it in correctly (when he had it a draw). And that maybe, during the process of tallying it all up, something on his sheet got changed or the wrong info could have been passed on to the announcers. When an inconsistency like this occurs, it's useful to match it with the other scorecards to see what went wrong. But, the disappearance of the IBF one, didn't allow that. And they're finding that to be dodgy.


And in regards to Hat Man, he [Khan] probably as the below issues with him:

• Why aren't the WBA, IBF, or anyone else, aware of who he is?
• If he's just a normal guy, why is he talking to WBA supervisor?
• What exactly is he talking to the WBA supervisor about?
• Is he trying to get the WBA supervisor to alter his scoring to match the other "fixed" ones?
• If the WBA supervisor refused to alter his and continue doing his thing, could he, the Hat Man, have played a role in informing "others" to make the IBF one disappear? lol: my God this is sounding ridiculous atsch)

By the way, is this the WBA's master scoresheet? It appears as though I was correct initially in saying he accidently scored it 10-8 to Khan in the 7th.

This content is protected

 

Sorry, it was 10-8.

And yes, I meant he copied it down wrong.

 

That's the where everything appears to have gone tits up.

 

And if he doesn't give the knockdown in the first that was a blatant push then Peterson wins by more. Stop picking and choosing which decisions you like and those you don't.

 

:think Yeah good point.

I think Khan may also be implying that 'Hat man' is somehow connected to the 'disappearance' of Walsh too.

It would be brilliant if this was all true (obviously not for Walsh or his family though).

 

Some Hollywood stuff here. Hope Walsh is ok.

 

Yes that would make sense.

It's a bit confusing. It appears that something fishy may have occured.

 

peterson only took the fight cos he knew all he had to do is make it competitive to win deal:tong:tong:hey

 

The tally - which could have been done right at the end - seems to be correct on that image. But I don't know where that scorecard is from. Is it the WBA's one? :huh Or just another one that someone else has copied? If it's the latter, which I think it is, then it's useless. In which case, the tallying of the original one(s) could have been messed up, too. Basically, it appears as though no one knows what Hill's original score was . I assume that's what they're investigating.

So yes, according to Schaefer, everything was consistent with the scoring of the other judges.

 

The more you delve into this the more confusing it becomes :huh

I wish Khan all the luck in the world getting to the bottom of this one.

I hope they catch 'Hat man' before he gets the chance to harass and distract any more sporting officials. My greatest wish is that Mr Walsh is returned to his family unhurt.