Mike Tyson's prime

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bballchump11, Jan 5, 2012.


  1. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    Why do people keep forgetting Tyson's down spiral after Rooney left? He was a a noticeably lesser fighter. I don't just say this because he started losing fights. I'm saying this because I can visually tell he wasn't the same fighter.
    To the people who say Tyson was still in his prime vs Holyfield or even Douglas haven't been paying attention enough.

    Here's Mike against Bone Crusher Smith in a fight that went the distance.
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fka_m4nyOLQ[/ame]


    Right away you can see Mike feint before coming in. Good head movement. Counterpunching. Jabbing with Smith as he jabs to get inside. Combination punching, quick feet, and atg speed and explosiveness. He didn't try to get you out with every single punch. Tyson was also more patient when needed to be in his prime and yes A MUCH BETTER COUNTER PUNCHER.

    Compare this to the Holyfield fight and it's not the same fighter. You can't honestly tell me he was still at his peak. Just watch one round and you can tell the difference.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08Hm0dTTO2s[/ame]
    Tell me, did you even see Tyson use his jab to cut the distance? How much countering did he do?
     
  2. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    rooney was the last of cus's style
     
  3. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,654
    692
    Oct 17, 2009
    spot on, rooney leaving tyson was the single biggest factor in his demise.
     
  4. Jetset78

    Jetset78 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,669
    0
    Jul 30, 2007
    He was on the slide in Bruno I
     
  5. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    :good thanks man. I do think Holyfield still would have beaten a Prime Tyson because Mike's inside game wasn't as good as many people believed. He allowed himself to be tied up too much and would seem to just take a breather once he got there. He was best mid range similar to Pacquiao.

    But he would have been much more competitive with him.
     
  6. DanishFightfan

    DanishFightfan Boxing Junkie banned

    7,546
    4
    Mar 7, 2011
    Mike Tyson clearly lost a step when Rooney left him..
    But he was still a dangerous fighter afterwards, i don't think that this thread was made to make any excuses for Tyson, but in the end of the day he still has three ugly losses when he still was a factor on the big scene, consistency is (imo) so important when judging legacy, some random baseball player once said" many athletes can have 1 or 2 good years, but when you have to do it for 5,10,15 years, then it becomes difficult"..
    I am not taking anything away from Tyson though, he was an extremely impressive fighter in his prime, and he did enough to edge (in my book) the HW top 10..
     
  7. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    True but we shouldnt overlook the influence of robing givens and how simple minded mike was, he was kept on a tight leash by cus, fighting often so he didnt have the time to get reckless yet afterwards he became more of a headhunter when he kicked rooney out and was with don king punching chicks and living wild.
     
  8. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    Tyson looked better against Holy 2nd time round, he had trained harder & was doing ok until his old sparring cut reopened & he lost the plot.

    Mike also had a couple of moments in their 1st fight, he rocked Holy with the 1st right hand he threw & landed a great combination in the 5th or 6th, I forget which.

    Post prison he wasnt a ruined fighter, still dangerous but easier to beat. Holy would have beaten him back in 90/91 imo
     
  9. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    true. He fought 4 times in 87 and 3 times in 88 with the first 2 fights in 88 being before April.
     
  10. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcRXu8PyZe8[/ame]
     
  11. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    I really thought Rooney would go on to be a ATG trainer.Anyone who can't see something died inside Mike after Kevin is only fooling themselves.
    He was never the same and I'll never be convinced otherwise.
    Good thread.
     
  12. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    his power has always been good, but he still didn't look the same. Not enough body punching and he loaded up on every shot. He used more headmovement than he did vs Evander, but it was a little sloppy and not as coordinated/balanced
     
  13. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    I think you are overstating his decline. He still looked sharp & aggressive against a timid opponent & not that far removed from his prime

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2cOtzA64ns[/ame]

    Against Holy (&Douglas)he was such a huge favourite & wasnt expecting a tough nights work. When Holy didnt crumble after the first big shot Mike gradually fell to pieces, but Holy would have always beaten Mike so I dont read too much into that.

    In the 2nd fight Mike was better prepared & looked a lot closer to his old self but couldnt/wouldnt sustain that level of performance once he encountered problems he couldnt solve.
     
  14. judman

    judman Member Full Member

    240
    0
    Oct 7, 2009
    Who were those clowns in his corner in the Douglas fight? They were using a balloon with cold water in it,on Mikes swollen eye..Were was the enswell???
     
  15. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    Mike is the sentimental favorite to most guys on the forum because they started watching boxing because of him. Tyson wasn't the same fighter against Douglas and Holy that's true. But Evender was also past his prime and Douglas was never that good to begin with. The only objective criteria for Mike greatness was the fact that when he faced another HOF around his prime he lost.