The KHANspiracies. Other angles here. What or who are they covering up?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Phys, Jan 5, 2012.


  1. Phys

    Phys Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,941
    0
    May 16, 2011
    Well I just coined the term, Khanspiracies.

    But some points or issues.

    1. If nothing else, one or more judges are dealing with this guy and are not even looking at the fight, in spurts. This seems to be incontrovertible.
    2. Is it even appropriate for a judge to be seated right by a promoter? or one of the fighter's family members?

    Then we have the rest of the story of possible interference.

    I think this has prob happened since time immemoriral--only got caught here.
     
  2. RNS

    RNS Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,239
    0
    Jun 11, 2011
    the thing Khan has sort of failed to explain is Michael Welsh was the supervisor he was not judging the fight.

    this latest round of crying is all aimed towards getting a rematch.
     
  3. Phys

    Phys Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,941
    0
    May 16, 2011
    That may be true, but at least one of the judges is on the right and was dealing with whatever was going on and was not watching the fight, the vid shows.

    While the fight is happening, there should not be anything else going on there. ANd if cards are handed in at trhe end of a rd say, again that should not be anytihng distracting happening during a Rd.
     
  4. dubace

    dubace Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,807
    2
    Oct 21, 2009
    that's a great job on the title
     
  5. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    14,484
    3
    Oct 12, 2010
    I'm with you on this one Phys, we need to dig deeper, I feel the surface is just being scratched
     
  6. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    6
    Aug 7, 2010
    **** this ****...We need a rematch!
     
  7. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Khan did explain this. It's just us, the fans, who made the mistake of thinking he was a judge. Khan clearly explains who the guy in the red tie was.
     
  8. stocks

    stocks Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,558
    0
    Aug 19, 2010
    Could not agree more! Re-match is needed!
     
  9. Chibuku

    Chibuku I'm awesome Full Member

    3,300
    1
    Jul 4, 2008
    No rematch,Walsh did not score the fight so this will not affect the outcome,will just show Khan is a bum
     
  10. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    Peterson should be stripped and titles handed back to Khan with the fight being overturned to a win for Khan unless Peterson can personally explain who Hatman is and what he was doing touching The scorecards!

    :think
     
  11. Vergilius

    Vergilius Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,220
    3
    May 29, 2010
    Well - if he hadn't lost two points from fouls, 2/3 of those judges would have had him as the winner, som maybe it's not terribly relevant.
     
  12. finalfight

    finalfight Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,706
    1
    Dec 5, 2008
    Get the **** outta here! :lol:
     
  13. Mrtibbs

    Mrtibbs Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,800
    78
    Aug 5, 2009
    Dont agree.

    A rematch should be made. ASAP
     
  14. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    obviously I was joking obviously.
     
  15. dazl1212

    dazl1212 kafir and proud Full Member

    672
    0
    Dec 17, 2010
    :patsch
    God, I wish Khan would just shut the **** up!!