The Magic of Mike Tyson with Emanuel Steward

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Jan 5, 2012.


  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,517
    15,934
    Jul 19, 2004
    Even if he does do that generally speaking, in the case of Tyson where is he wrong exactly?

    Well Ali was such a unique boxing specimen that I think size was just one of many advantages Ali had over Tyson.

    That said, I certainly think Ali's size gives him yet another important edge that puts Tyson at a disadvantage.

    Are you saying you do not see Ali's size as an advantage?
     
  2. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,882
    5,218
    Aug 19, 2010
    He is right, but I think he overrates that a bit .....


    I see Ali´s size as an advantage, no doubt, one of the advantages.....I simply think others factors would be more important for Ali against Tyson....

    in my humble opinion.....
     
  3. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,517
    15,934
    Jul 19, 2004
    Fair enough! :good

    I think we're actually on the same page here.
     
  4. MURK20

    MURK20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,519
    1,344
    Sep 26, 2008
    I agree. Tyson is actually bigger than Frazier and I would bet the house that he was much stronger.
     
  5. AnthonyJ74

    AnthonyJ74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    53
    Feb 26, 2007
    Yeah, I agree. Ali was no bigger than Trevor Berbick. Granted, Ali was on a different planet skill wise compared to Berbick, but physically, Ali and Berbick were equal. So, Ali's size would not bother Mike.
     
  6. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    i think a large part of the Tyson mystique is and always was grounded in the fact that tyson was short and squat for a heavyweight. maybe thats been forgotten or supressed in the discusions of boxing connoisers but it was a large part of his mainstream appeal.
    tyson was always the pitpull terrier savaging the Great danes of the heavyweight division. he was admired for handing out one-sided beatings or winning fights in less than 2 minutes in a way that he wouldnt have been admired had he been 6'4 with an 82 reach and doin the same
     
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    It's pretty simplistic analysis, Ettiene went toe-toe with him, look how that turned out and Ettiene was good enough to beat Brewster btw Do we seriously think Holmes and Rudduck were intimidated either? Tucker did what Lennox did pretty much too in the early going but Tyson broke him down to the body

    He's right about backing Mike up and getting his respect, but that's basic boxing to do against any puncher or boxer for that matter, it's boxing 101. It's not just something you do against Tyson and doing it is allot easier than saying it

    As for Tyson not doing well against the bigger guys. Well Tucker was 6'5, Smith 6'4, Bruno 6'3, Holmes 6'3
     
  8. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
    Agree.

    Always thought the intimidation thing is a bit overblown.
     
  9. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    in his autobiography larry holmes says he didnt want to come out of his dressing room and was thinking about calling the fight off at the last second.
    i would call that intimidated
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,804
    44,427
    Apr 27, 2005
    Steward isn't talking about any half decent big hoohaa. He's talking about super skillful big guys who weren't afraid. He's talking peak Holmes, Holyfield, Lewis and Ali.

    Holmes shouldn't be in the discussion, he was that far past peak. Didn't matter how confident or agressive he was. Steward has said Holmes could no longer keep Tyson at a range where he could see his punches and this was the difference.

    Steward is spot on imo.

     
  11. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
    Wouldn't call Holyfield a big heavyweight.
     
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,804
    44,427
    Apr 27, 2005

    Holyfield is pretty much on par with Holmes and Ali. Possibly weighed a little more in peak fights and only 1/2" or so shorter.

    His point is they ALL tower over Tyson. Tyson is a similar weight or bugger all heavier. Holyfield correctly predicted that if you start fighting and pushing him back he'll fold. Very few could do it, but Holyfield sure did. He would have done it at anytime.

    These four all had the skills, heart, determination and intangibles to take Mike into deep water and eventually drown him. It's extremely rarified air, and plenty of greats thru history would not have been able to do it. Mike would have ran plenty of them over.
     
  13. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
    I have serious doubts Holyfield could have done that to Rooney-Tyson contrary to significantly technically declined week-minded post-prison Tyson.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,804
    44,427
    Apr 27, 2005
    Steward would 100% disagree. I also believe Holyfield would have rolled him.

    Holyfield still entered the ring a massive underdog. His was a fantastic blueprint, and he predicted it as such. He was masterful at not letting Tyson get off in his favoured midrange and doing his own damage. Tyson hung in a long time.

    Tyson was better pre Douglas for sure, but i still like Holyfield. I favour him, Holmes, Ali, Lewis, all of them over any version of Tyson at their finest. Foreman too. I think Tyson would beat Marciano and Dempsey, be a good fight with Louis and wipe out Charles, Walcott and such style and arsenal wise. Not sure about Liston. I'm undecided whether Liston had the snap needed to beat such a fast punching opponent.
     
  15. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
    Can Mike at least be a favourite against Klitschkos, John?;)