Amir Khan Interview Shutdown during Steroid Questioning [STRANGE VIDEO]

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Prince., Dec 11, 2011.


  1. dazl1212

    dazl1212 kafir and proud Full Member

    672
    0
    Dec 17, 2010
    Explain......
     
  2. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    I don't get it. What are all of the conspirators getting out of the decision? Even if the decision is overturned, it doesn't change Khan's sub-par performance.

    This was far from the worst decision last year and quite frankly more than half of the people here had Lamont winning.

    Khan acts like a spoiled, entitled kid. Fight better especially when you are trying to cherry pick and avoid tougher fights.

    Peterson SD Khan
     
  3. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    There's a chance that Khan had his belts taken away from him unfairly. And you're telling him to shut up and accept it?

    That's why you're not very bright.
     
  4. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Rematch! They want the friggin' rematch!

    Whether they hand the belts back to Khan, rule it a no-contest, or whatever, the most important thing is a rematch be ordered to put this nonsense to bed. That's what Khan's team are saying.
     
  5. Prince.

    Prince. 24/7 365 Full Member

    12,310
    0
    Jul 26, 2011
    Can you elaborate on this. Which fighters would you have wanted Khan to face instead of Peterson? Who has Khan ducked in 2011?
     
  6. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    I'm rubbish on a computer & have zero photoshop/paint skills. :-(

    Check out the thread, some of them are hilarious.
     
  7. dazl1212

    dazl1212 kafir and proud Full Member

    672
    0
    Dec 17, 2010
    Fair enough. I pointed out on another thread that I dont think he was cheated out of his belts as I had him losing. If something untoward has happened fair enough. There should be a rematch anyway but if it turns out nothing dodgy has happened then if I where Peterson I'd tell him to go **** himself.
    to me it just looks like he's desperately trying to find anything he can to get the decision over turned. How do you know this isnt somebody to do with GBP? As the 115-110 decision to Khan was the dodgiest card IMO:bart Do you think he has been cheated out of his belts? How did you score the fight? :think
     
  8. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Because he's part of Peterson's entourage. There are photos of him celebrating with Peterson after.
     
  9. Prince.

    Prince. 24/7 365 Full Member

    12,310
    0
    Jul 26, 2011
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MoO-8B57Kc&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2cdV6wlrcs&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL[/ame]
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Djm8vX5UXq4&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL[/ame]
     
  10. PBFred

    PBFred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,057
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    You know how they can get a rematch? By not trying to dictate purse and other terms to the champ. Let Lamont get the majority of the HBO money and I'm sure he will be on board.

    Khan was chasing Peterson for a year because he was viewed as an easier fight than the hard hitters like Maidana, Matthysse, etc. I know Lamont was the mandatory but the only time that carries any weight is when it suits the champs agenda.

    I love watching Khan fights and he is one of the few that I will clear my night for to watch. His sense of entitlement doesn't match his accomplishments and I guess that's my problem with him.
     
  11. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
    They had the judges sitting side by side?
     
  12. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    khan is being such a cry baby *****, i hope he fights cotto next so he gets broken in half.
     
  13. dazl1212

    dazl1212 kafir and proud Full Member

    672
    0
    Dec 17, 2010
    Is he? :lol: Just because he was in the ring with Peterson doesn't mean a lot. Surely if he was they wouldn't be so blatant about it?
    Oh dear I take some of it back if true.
    Khans still a whiney ***** just based on his interview after the fight:lol:
    I agree Relentless that would be a fun fight
     
  14. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    The heck are you talking about? :lol:

    This is all to do with investigating the strange circumstances of the result and having the bodies order a rematch, and you’re talking about Khan should stop dictating the purse agreements? How is that an issue? In fact, how has it ever been an issue? For their first fight they had no problems splitting the money.

    Besides, you’re clueless if you think Lamont should take home most of the HBO money. Holding a belt doesn’t guarantee you the bigger share. That’s not how business works.
     
  15. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    No, the judges always sit on 3 different sides of the ring.