Wladmir klitschko last 12 fights - how does it compare?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Conn, Jan 6, 2012.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,064
    48,213
    Mar 21, 2007
    He would have fought better fighters in that era. So it would certainly be harder to "dismiss."
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,891
    22,082
    Sep 15, 2009
    Well I had him beating fres and drawing with golota so personally wlad beat the guy I considered the premiere fighter.

    More importantly from a global view the ring had chris ranked number 1 at the time of the fight between chris and wlad also.

    I'm not interested in how weak an era might be, i'm more interested in a man fighting the best available opponents and wlad has done that imo.
     
  3. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    well i think eddie chambers of 2010 would have held his own among the Tubbs and Page and Berbicks, or Bugner and Young and Lyle and Shavers, or against Mercer and Morrison etc.
    for example
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,206
    25,508
    Jan 3, 2007
    I agree with all of this.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,891
    22,082
    Sep 15, 2009
    Who was, in your opinion?
     
  6. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    Better? By what measure? Chagaev was undefeated 25-0 WBA champ, 2-times amateur world champ. Ibragimov - undefeated WBO champ, Olympic silver medalist.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,064
    48,213
    Mar 21, 2007
    Better as in better? In order to post 12-0 in title defences between 1969 and 1975, for example, he would likely have had to have beaten Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Norton etc. Kind of undermines "Olympic silver medalist", doesn't it?

    And once more, to stress, I think that Chagaev was really quite faded when he met Wlad. At his prime, a good scalp, but at that time...
     
  8. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    yes but no one did that. of course wladimirs record compares unfavourable to a hypothetical fighter who does that.
    but against actual 12-0 runs against contenders at HW its pretty good.
     
  9. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,206
    25,508
    Jan 3, 2007
    True,

    And from 1989-1995 it wouldn't look much easier as he'd likely have to face prime versions of Tyson, Holyfield, Lewis, Bowe, Moorer, Ruddock and perhaps even a resurgent Foreman. Don't see either of the Klits putting together a 12-0 run in that time frame.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,064
    48,213
    Mar 21, 2007
    Which was my entire point when I responded to your remark about Wlad's run being tougher to dismiss if it had happened in the seventies or eighties, or words to that affect. Of course it would be, it would call for him to beat a much higher class of fighter.
     
  11. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
    It would have been interesting to see even if fights with someone from their time frame happened like not faded Rahman, Tua or Ibeabuchi.
     
  12. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Wlad is the champion of nothing.
     
  13. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    im not so sure.
    but of course that was the question posed in this thread.
    holmes had better than a 12-0 run in the 1970s - 1980s ( i think he went 20-0 in title fights) but i think its very debatable whether his top 12 in his run, or the best consecutive 12 he managed, is better than Wlad's last 12 fights.
    Tyson went 10-0 in title fights i think, also in the 1980s. i think the quality of those 10 is better than Wlad's but not by much, and 10 is not 12.

    i think Ali in the 1970s has a clearly better 12-0 at some point. probably !
    but he took on regular easy ones, and had some disputed decisions too. so it might not be as clear in front of Wlad as i would imagine.
     
  14. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Wrong.

    Wlad has consistently NOT fought the best available opponents.

    Has he fought Vitali? NO.

    Did he rematch Brewster while Lamont was still on top? NO.

    Did he rematch Sanders? NO.

    Inexcusable.
     
  15. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    How many of these guys were the #1 or #2 HW in the world when Wlad fought them?