Who Will Floyd Mayweather Fight On May 5, 2012?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by paulfv, Jan 6, 2012.


  1. Brauer

    Brauer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,565
    2
    Oct 15, 2011
    :lol: so Peterson would beat him but Canelo has no chance
     
  2. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    They don't need Floyd anymore. When they thought they needed him, they wanted him. Now, the shoe is on the other foot.

    You think Arum is going to give Floyd a faded Pac and a big payday?

    :lol:

    Remember: This is a business.

    Now, if Floyd looks faded in his next outing, then Arum will start talking Pac-Floyd for Nov 2012.

    This is how it works. Ask the Mayweather crew how they felt about facing Pac after Pac-Cotto.
     
  3. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    I'll guess Alvarez or Cotto. I'd love to see the latter.
     
  4. chinachin

    chinachin Active Member Full Member

    1,169
    0
    Mar 4, 2011
    I'd die to see him with Alvarez.
     
  5. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Uncle Oden convinced me on my first instinct:

    Mayweather-Cotto on May 5, 2012
     
  6. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    Your book is full of **** :rofl
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    This :deal

    The biggest irony is, just about ALL the rabid Floyd fanboys post how Pac only wants guys that lose, or look bad in their last fight. And now they are watering at the mouth for this fight since Pac looked bad in his last fight.

    I really don't see how these fools aren't aware of their own stupidity. :patsch
     
  8. Eastcoast

    Eastcoast Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,763
    2
    Dec 1, 2005
    I hope it's Cotto at 154, but you better add Lamont Peterson to the list. It would screw with things for two of Floyd's potential future opponents in Pac and Khan.
     
  9. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    his book comes with big letters and a bunch of pictures :lol:
     
  10. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    it wont be pac. that is for sure. arum says pac fights in june
     
  11. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    when has floyd ever faded? they dont want floyd because hes too good right now.
     
  12. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    So the shoe is on the other foot now? As in Floyd NEEDS Pac?

    Here are some facts:

    Pac just got schooled by a guy Mayweather dominated after a 2yr lay off 2 years ago.

    Floyd makes more money than Pac against common and any opponent he fights, and will definitely now.

    The boxing world now pretty much decisively sees FLOYD as P4P #1 after Pacs showing against Marquez.



    It is Pacquiao that badly needs to fight and beat Floyd right now to restore the aura of invincibility he had before Marquez BEAT him again. :deal
     
  13. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,912
    3,242
    Apr 26, 2010
    So you are co-signing that Manny doesn't need Floyd, shouldn't fight Floyd, and is faded? This is sad **** dude, and I'm honestly shocked at you taking this position, you are cool with the duck.
     
  14. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008
  15. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    I was co-signing the last part, how he waited till Pac looked more vulnerable. Hell, it was actualy suggested that Floyd would do that a couple years ago. I actually never thought it would be the case.

    Next time, just ASK me rather then assuming, and then going off on it. No need to be so selective on what you acknowledge.