So, what you're saying is that people are easily swayed by HBO and Sky (who felt Khan had lost, btw). Here's what Graham Houston has to say on Fightwriter: Very experienced writer and scorer of fights. Incidentally, he felt Khan won, but his analysis explains why the fight was so close. With the point deductions, which Houston felt were harsh, it was a fair score for Peterson. I couldn't give a **** what the casuals have to say. These are the same people who thought Khan would fight George Groves, FFS!
If anything Barry was hanging off Khan's nuts on ITV clinging onto a job there so had to overhype Khan. I remember him talking some right bull**** about him and how his speed and skills are amazing like a Sugar Ray. Embarrassing stuff but since he's been allowed his own opinion and seen Khan is a decent champion but not the elite fighting machine many would like him to be he's spoken sense and truth about Khan. Off to bed anyways long trip to Canterbury awaits me in morning..
lol youre obviously a troll account of Laz or Darni or another such Khan nuthugger...Lauri was 34 and was 1 punch KO'd. Khan has never managed a proper KO yet, the 2 "KOs" on his record are Amir getting sparked by Prescott and Khans dubious below the belt stoppage on Judah after the headbutt. :yep
No I'm not. Lauri was at the end of his career and was schooling McCloskey till the knock out, Witter destroyed a prime Lauri in two rounds. Frankly, I couldn't care less about how many knock outs Khan has, he still beat your boy McCloskey in a cake walk.
Come on round it up lads. ESB Landlord Ray has seen enough. You don't have to go home, but you sure have to get the **** out of here.
The point is that these individuals you are on about who are "with Khan" sided with him by a single point or maybe two, therefore very close and subjective. Yet you're acting like everyone's making him a clear, obvious, wide winner, when no one is.