and if its as got nothing to do with the result why is khan crying like **** for a nc, shameful really is
I started posting on here right after the Prescott loss, when most people wrote Khan off and said he will never win a world title.
What makes you think Khans smart enough to make adjustments in a fight, he never has done, he runs around the ring like Usain Bolt flapping his hands about, He gets caught on the ropes and has no defence, is Roach going to change that in one training camp? don't make me laugh.
so it does not matter if your robbed, just as long as the guy in the hat is there the robbery is justified
I can only speak for myself, what Khan thinks and what I think are two completely different things...I don't give a **** who won the fight but when the result is read out in any contest I need to be comfortable that the judging and scoring process is unsullied, I can't say that about this fight.
Boxing scoring is subjective, I disagree with judges scores quite a lot but if the process is clean then you have to go with it. The key word is subjective...when you say Lara was robbed do you mean that you think that the officials were corrupt or had taken a bung??
:deal Rules & procedures need to be followed or why have them in the 1st place. The IBF shouldnt have let Hat Man get involved when there is no justification for him doing what he was doing regardless of the result.
as i said soon as your bum boy got blasted out, nothing when the going was good moron. it was a given presscott was going to happen all us boxing fans could see it just a shame the khan fans seen it a little to late :rofl:rofl:rofl
His mind set of being thick and having very little ring IQ, that's not a simple adjustment. Nor is the ability to be able to follow a gameplan for 12 rounds.
In a way, this will doom Khan. This means he would have learnt nothing from the fight, because it was 'fixed'. Where is the investigation for the Cox - Sai fight? That was beyond criminal, but oh wait, Khan is famous....
lara williams was a bigger robbery than the peterson fight which was the right result imho deal with it khan fans
seems to me your just a blind delusional khan fan know lots of them, a bit like when naz fought but they all disappeared soon as they realized he was not all that and barrera owned him, a bit like how presscott owns khan
i totally understand where youre coming from about the process being dodgy in this one, but with regards to lara-williams and other robberies, a judge does not have to be corrupt or take a bung for them to rob a fighter. take pacman-marquez 3, do i think any of the judges took any money for that result? absolutely not. do i think anyone applied direct pressure for them to give that result? absolutely not. but if you work for the WBO are you going to give up the organisations cash cow and leave the people above you in your company (who decide your employment) out of pocket?