Canelo is a far more legit opponent for PBF than Ortiz

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lewishamboy, Jan 6, 2012.


  1. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    drop the lawsuit pacman so floyd will step into negotiating table.
     
  2. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Are you really this stupid. So now your admitting that the lawsuit is hurting the fight, yet you *******s claim that its not a ploy to avoid the fight. I'm not sure you can have it both ways, since the mayweathers aren't the only ones to say outright or imply that pac is on something yet they are the only ones being sued
     
  3. CoDer

    CoDer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,914
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    no you're claiming on the fight when floyd won't even negotiate unless pacman drop the lawsuit.

    lawsuit was a non issue until pacman agreed to the drug test.

    maywheathers started the entire PEDs shithead.
     
  4. persianprince

    persianprince Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,890
    120
    Mar 29, 2011
    No ****ing way...Ortiz resume is much better
     
  5. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011
    Canelo hasnt proved that hes the best at 154 so why is he trying to fight the best at 147. First thing he should do is give up that belt and admit that he aint no real champion. Then maybe he can engage in some meaningful fights without the fear of losing a belt. That belt is just stunting his growth as a fighter.If he cleans out 154, then he will get the experience that he needs and the right to proclaim that he is a true champion. Only then will it make sense to call out fighters like Mayweather.
     
  6. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    48,209
    37,057
    Apr 17, 2011
    Canelo was trying to emulate Floyd and Gomez kept landing. It was hilarious and made Canelo look stupid. :lol:
     
  7. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Actaully he didn't start it. It was started at golden boy when a reporter from your homelan stated that pac may be on something

    At the end of the day none of that matters pacs mouth piece shot down the idea of them fighting NOW you dumb fu*k. As he has done before.
     
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so it's time to hype canelo now just like when they hyped ortiz as a young hungry lion. we can smell it from a far. may 5th was reserved by schaefer for a mayweather-alvarez fight.
     
  9. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i think this is the new floyd demand right? anyways, he is fighting canelo next or at least a GBP fighter.
     
  10. KarlBrandt

    KarlBrandt Active Member Full Member

    1,310
    0
    Oct 20, 2011
    Martinez will be 37 years old on february,people will discredit Mayweather
     
  11. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    I've been ok with the prospect of Floyd-Canelo, but that ^^ is a good point. :think
     
  12. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Don't be silly. At 154, Martinez is a far more dangerous and legit opponent than Canelo. Regardless of his age.
     
  13. KarlBrandt

    KarlBrandt Active Member Full Member

    1,310
    0
    Oct 20, 2011
    This is true but if Mayweather wins people will say that Martinez was 37 years old
     
  14. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Nah man. They won't. Mayweather himself is 34. That's only 3 years younger than Sergio. In some cases, age ain't nothing but a number. Sergio has proven to be a top-notch fighter at 37.
     
  15. Jetmax

    Jetmax Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,729
    0
    Jan 4, 2010
    First you are admitting you're a ***** why else would you be butthurt. Second I am not a *******, nevertheless what am I doing now that you are talking about? Do tell me please.

    Or you just label anyone who say something bad about *****s like you as *******s? smh.