SO Pac has to actually provide evidfence against himself? Are you all ****ing idiots?When did it ever happened in the American legal system? In case the court allows it, it opens the floodgate to other cases wherein the one has to provide evidence against himself. If Gayweather quack, then he must know something. Fishing expedition does not count in the legal system. You are all dumb to believe that ****.
He doesn't have to prove anything against himself... He has to prove that Mayweather's statement was a lie. It's really easy to read up on. It's Pac's case. He has the burden of proof here. You can rant and rave all you want about how stupid the Mayweathers are, but the law is very clear on this. If you bring a defamation suit, the burden of proof is on you to prove that the statement of fact is a lie. :good
deal:deal In a defamation case, at least when the speech is on a matter of public concern, "the plaintiff [must] bear the burden of showing falsity, as well as [the defendant's] fault, before recovering damages." This is true whether the plaintiff is a public figure or a private figure. See This content is protected . The common-law rule This content is protected that the defendant must prove truth, but Hepps This content is protected that for First Amendment reasons. http://volokh.com/posts/1161886999.shtml :deal Do yourself a favor and read.... This content is protected
And on the flip side: why did Pac agree to settle if he had such a strong, airtight case? You file defamation suits to recover damages, not apologies.
That would only be the case if he was on steroids, if he wasn't it would prove he was innocent. So what's the problem?
lmfao-typical ******* response- GO BACK AND LOOK AT THE POSTS AND REBUTTALS BETWEEN ME N THIS ***** RIGHT HERE.. LOOK AT WHAT HE RESORTS TOO-SEE PEJEVAN THIS IS WHY YOUR A STUPID FUKIN IDIOT *******... U RESPOND WITH BULL**** LIKE THIS U DUMB FUKIN IDIOT//--GET OVER MY JOB TOO..U FUKERS ASKED N I TOLD U ***GOTS N U JUST CAN'T DEAL WITH IT-..I COULD GIVE A FUK.IM HERE TO TALK BOXING N U WERE FUKIN OWNEDhi:
I think its really simple.. why would you refuse to provide information if you have nothing to hide? Like the same reason he didn't take the blood tests?
Damn I thought I put this thread to bed a few posts ago... No need to kick 'em while he's down. I think he can read what I, and others, have spelled out for him.
Sometimes them extra kicks are needed to get the point across (start at 00:25 mark): [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DSCZBwW1hg&t=0m26s[/ame]
That don't make no goddamn sense. That was a well-executed, well-deserved ass-whoopin if I ever seen't one. Especially when the barber growls at him while he's punching. "Mmmm! You think I'ma take a motha****in case?!?!?"
Dude, Oscar and Shaefer's part of the case was dropped because Oscar sent ARUM an appology via Twitter!! yep Twitter!! :rofl Not to Pac either, but Arum!!