Battle of the green greats: Charles vs Robinson; December 1942

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Jan 7, 2012.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    For me the only ambiguity is those I can't see footage of (greb etc.)

    I still have no idea how i'm going to accurately judge the skillset of the non-filmed greats.

    However everyone i've seen footage of, robinson is the best at using his skillset, in my opinion of course.
     
  2. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    Bivins was better than Lesnevich.
    But i dont think Lesnevich was "a complete paper champion". He was actually a good choice for champion when Billy Conn moved up. He has some good wins.
     
  3. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    Charles would struggle down to 160 for this fight, and perhaps be a few pounds more when he steps in the ring. Conservatively lets say he's an actual 163.
    Robinson was 145 pounds at this time.
    This might be a mismatch
     
  4. Guyfawkes

    Guyfawkes Than who was phone?! Full Member

    1,446
    8
    Jul 18, 2011
    Ezzard takes a ud
     
  5. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,263
    8,856
    Jul 17, 2009
    Exactly how I see it.
     
  6. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,580
    1,920
    Sep 9, 2011
    a good big'un beats a good lil'un. but this is good bg'un vs great lil'un. cant decide
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,178
    Sep 15, 2009
    I overestimated my criticism. He was a perfect choice from conn's departure onwards. I just think from the bivins fight on his status as champ was very weak.

    He had an amazing 46-48 though but that was pretty much wholly at heavyweight.
     
  8. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,947
    Nov 21, 2009
    Ships passing in the night.
     
  9. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,183
    45,087
    Mar 3, 2019
    Aside from size, I think styles favour Charles. Both were very fast and had ATGs chins, but Ezzard's defence was much better than Robinson's. An aggressive boxer-puncher like Robinson didn't have the work rate to take a lot many rounds from Charles. I think Charles would fight defensively and let Robinson come in range for Ezz to push up against him and flurry inside, I think Robinson takes 5/6 rounds due to him being Sugar Ray Robinson, but ultimately lose to Ezz fighting smart on the inside with timed flurries, smooth moves and blocking SRR's biggest shots. I also think that it's fair to assume Ezzard had better feet at this point, he outboxed Burley, Robinson was still developing.
    Ezz would basically fight like a better, bigger Gavalin but for most of the round, not just the end.

    This is one of technically the best match ups ever. Charles UD15.
     
  10. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,183
    45,087
    Mar 3, 2019
    Are you taking the ****?

    Ezzard Charles = Sugar Ray Robinson pfp. Possibly less, possibly more. Both are top 10 pfp LOCKS.
    To call Ezzard Charles 'good' and blatantly implying he's not great is underrating him so much, it's disgusting.
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  11. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,440
    Feb 10, 2013
    December 1, 1942 Charles weighed 166. On the same card Robinson fought and weighed 145. Thats a 21 pound weight difference. Thats how great Robinson was. Only two months later Charles was weighing in the mid 170s consistently. Robinson stayed right around 144/145 for a couple more years at least. We are asking who would win between him and guy who was 21 pounds heavier. Willie Pep, one of the greatest boxing masters of all time weighed 129.5 in December 1942. You NEVER see anyone asking who would win between Pep and Robinson and yet Pep was only 15.5 pounds lighter than Robinson. Again, thats how great Robinson was. Now, if Robinson made Charles make 160, having to drain down that low, that could be huge. Charles, despite his relatively recent elevated reputation, was not unbeatable as a middleweight and Robinson was better at 145 than anyone Charles had lost to at this time, so for me taking the intangibles into account its a pick em.
     
    ETM likes this.
  12. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,427
    11,890
    Mar 19, 2012
    Robinson was fighting to make a living. Your perspective is off. That fight wouldn't have made anywhere near the $ LaMotta drew. Burley was respected but the general public would not have come out for this.
     
  13. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,427
    11,890
    Mar 19, 2012
    Charles would have a natural size advantage. Height is marginal. Robinson is gonna be the quicker man of hand and foot. Looking at the films of Sugar Ray in 1939 Golden Gloves I would guess that he would be hard for Ezzard to catch. He has enough power to hurt bigger boxers. Charles may be drained making 160.
    It could go either way. Just the fact that were raising the question proves Robinson was the GOAT
     
  14. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,183
    45,087
    Mar 3, 2019
    Surely the Greb vs Holyfield thread gives a better case for the goat to Greb
     
  15. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,306
    19,768
    Jul 25, 2015
    Now, that's an avatar I can get behind!

    My pick is Charles. I just think even then the size is an important differential considering the class of both men.