Tommy Burns vs Harry Greb

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Dec 20, 2010.


  1. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,243
    1,670
    Sep 13, 2006
    If you read In the Ring With Tommy Burns you will have a much greater appreciation for Burns. He could stick and move and use his footwork and timing, or he could in-fight and war it out. He did both equally well in various fights. He had excellent conditioning, an excellent jaw, solid punching power, and good ring generalship. Despite his height deficiency, he had long arms and was surprisingly strong for his size. He was even better as a heavyweight, when he no longer had to badly weaken himself to make middleweight. Including the Marvin Hart victory, a fighter who weighted 195 pounds to Burns' 175, Tommy went 14-0, 11 KOs as a heavyweight before losing to Johnson. No shame there, given that Johnson came to be thought of as an ATG. He beat the strongest, roughest, most physical fighter in Hart, and the most experienced, fleet-footed, quickest boxer in O'Brien. Not bad.

    So does Burns have a shot to beat a 160-175-pound Greb? You bet. It's a fight.
     
  2. Black2023

    Black2023 Guest

    Forget Greb he would destory anyone today aint that right Flea?


    I mean the guy forgot more than you know...he was awesome...saw 4 and half minutes footage of him :lol:
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,335
    48,702
    Mar 21, 2007
    **** off you weirdo.
     
  4. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,530
    5,780
    Aug 19, 2010
    Greb.....because I think Burns wasn´t nothing special and nothing a real HW....and Greb is the Greatest IMHO....

    But I think it´s very hard for us to say without video of Greb.....
     
  5. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,530
    5,780
    Aug 19, 2010
    Yeah, agreed.....
     
  6. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,243
    1,670
    Sep 13, 2006
    Folks, Greb was only 5'8", one inch taller than Burns, he had a shorter reach than Burns, and he didn't weigh any more than Burns. In fact, he typically weighed about 10 pounds less than Burns did. Not sure why Burns is receiving no love here. Jim Flynn was a strong 169-pound swarming fighter with a punch and Burns stopped him in 15 rounds and won nearly every round.
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    You're familiar with his work then McGrain :lol:
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,659
    27,376
    Feb 15, 2006
    People certainly shouldn't dismiss Burn's chances here.

    He was a pound for pound great.

    Against Greb though, he is arguably up against the greatest p4p fighter who ever lived.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,177
    Sep 15, 2009
    Adam, dare I say, if you wrote a book about greb and went into as much detail as you're famed for, you'd almost certainly convince yourself greb should be the favourite.

    It's not about not loving burns, but we're pitting him against the wise man's choice for goat (basing on resume as opposed to skillset)
     
  10. Black2023

    Black2023 Guest


    :lol:

    fanboys to the rescue cant handle smacktalk....mgrain **** you :lol:
     
  11. Black2023

    Black2023 Guest

    still if flea says it, must be true....sullivan was awesome read about him :lol:
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    :patsch Never said that either, you really are a window licker.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,177
    Sep 15, 2009
    Has flea got a stalker :lol:
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    Yet again :patsch Maybe I should stop cussing the trolls ;-)
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,822
    29,267
    Jun 2, 2006
    Less than one chapter of that book was put up on this forum ,I found 12 inaccuracies in it without trying.
    The guy that wrote it is a joke.
    Burns is underated I agree, but some of the crap in that tome is ludicrous.