im an idiot because i think price is overated?or because i think his win over mcfathead is overated..better still dont answer either question i dont care..****ing idiot
I don't know. I don't think highly of both. Stiverne looked really bad until finishing Ray Austin. He didn't look to have much outside of that giant left hook of his.
If a fight between Price and Stiverne were to happen right now, i'd have a hard time picking a winner. Both hit extremely hard and have clear flaws in their game. Maybe Price's flaws have yet to be exposed in the pros, but trust me, he has them.
Yes you are. but you are also right about that other guy is talking bs. he is another British ****in dumb ass.
You are a fukin joke. Dude do you have any clue how big of a clown you were after Klitschko Haye? fukin ******.
let me get this straight your on here acting a **** because you cant tell when someone is acting a **** and when they arnt..ive no time for fools who take this board that serious..like i said please stop talking to me unless you stop being butthurt because you got owned by a newbie trolling..good day sir
It would be the opposite result from the amateurs now. Price is an excellent and dangerous professional heavyweight; Stiverne anything but.
It really all depends on David's chin. We keep hearing how it's just a matter of time until it gets checked in the pros, but... If he can take Helenius' power about as well as Chisora did, Price wins. If his chin is half as bad as it's supposed to be, he gets KTFO.
yea kind of how i see it to..im sorta leaning towards him not having a gd chin tho as he dosnt seem to fight any big hitters..i know its very early in his career tho..:good
Both Helenius and Price stop Stiverne IMO. The guy is just utter trash. Poor man's Shannon Briggs. With a better gas tank (or just being 10 years younger) Rainman Austin would have won a lopsided decision against him. You can be built like a brick shithouse, but won't get far without any boxing skill..