The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Look you ****ing ******* im no hater. I never said Pac wasn't a great fighter or he wasn't FOTD. in fact him being FOTD only makes me more annoyed about the whole ****ing saga.

Bigger and better things like David ****ing Diaz. You really aren't credible untill you get Pacs and Arums balls out of your mouth.

As a boxing fan im pissed this fight isn't happening. on both sides. you are ok with it not happening. i wonder why?

 

Why didn't you want to see Marquez 3 after the first two fights? a draw and a sd really conclusive for you? seriously you should think before you post this absolute nonsense.

what your saying is im a massive Pac fan and don't give a **** who he ducks. As long as he's winning your happy.

 

Lame, beyond it being blatantly obvious that you don't understand accounting, you're actually too dense to realize this is what I just said.

Stadiums don't fall from the sky, son.

Again, using YOUR OWN LOGIC, someone (Arum; GBP; investors; etc.) needs to come up with that 8 million to build this stadium(CAPITAL COST). Because, you know, right now there is NO stadium.

Simply put, that 8M HAS to be accounted for. Somewhere.

Most likely, they (whoever builds the stadium) plan on getting that initial investment money (i.e. stadium) off the back end. You know, like the GATE REVENUES (as you WRONGLY call it: 'ticket sales, parking, merchandise, food & beverage sales...ect...ect.. ect) that YOU project at $30M.

Does that not compute with you?

============

Even if we accept the (false) notion that stadium's cost won't in any way come out of the shared gate, YOUR OWN NUMBER ($30M after stadium) is STILL only an additional 7-8 million (or 3M per camp) over what the MGM could do on May 5th.

To put this in context, ODLH vs Mayweather did $120M in PPV revenue. Pac vs. Mayweather probably does $140-$160 (conservatively).

And here you are, defending the falling apart of the biggest fight in boxing history that can be made over a risky stadium proposal that will, BY YOUR OWN PROJECTIONS, only add 6-8 million to the pot.

And that makes sense to you?

Stay in your lane, square. You ain't built for this. :verysad

 

Again with the Diaz fight, just like the with the current situation and the December quote, ignoring logic and reason and carrying on like broken records with the same ****. Roach mentioned the possibility of fighting DLH, Hatton, Cotto before Marquez II. It's logical to not jump straight from 130 to those weights. I would have liked to have seen Pac-Marquez II, but the fact he fought De La Hoya, and then Hatton and Cotto for belts at 140-147 means you can't hold it against him. And like I said, you don't hold the same standard to Marquez, who ducked the immediate rematch then lost to Chris John which delayed the rematch and it happened 4 years later. Something tells me you clowns will manage to blame that on Pac too

 

Get the **** outa here... You mean to tell me that Stadiums really DON'T fall out of the sky? **** you.... I'm not buying that load of **** on my worse day.

There are plenty of investors who are more than willing to step up to put of the capital for the fight. The biggest dilemma is figuring out which insanely rich investor to give the contract to. This event is like a guranteed winning lottery ticket to the 1% of the world population that has pockets as deep as the grand canyon.

The investors aren't worried about the costs of securing this contract...they know the "ROI" is as good as knowing LV is hot and dry. They'll front the money for all capital expenses.......front the fighters purses (or at least a hefty percentage) all in the name of landing the "big one". This is like the iPod... a game changer....one that smart investors and/or stupidly rich ones are jockeying for position to nail down...why? Because they know just how big this fight will be and it's like having the winning powerball number in hand before the big money lotto is played.

$30 million is a conservative figure....$60 million is high...anything in between is what will actually be made when its all said and done.... and that is business 101 "son".

And the **** do you mean..."I'm not built for this ****"? Of course I am kid... And you know it too.

 

Man... I don't know how a dude as intelligent as you sides with this BS.

 

These posts show he's not intelligent. Seriously, go back and look at him constantly 'self-check' himself in this thread.

To his credit, he just articulates '*******-ism' better than most. But underneath all the bluster, it IS just well articulated '*******-ism'.

 

That is exactly what I mean. He obviously is no dummy. It is just insane the lengths he uses his intelligence, which is rare among *******s, to rationalize the complete BS position of Team Pac.

He uses his brain to create these justifications for Team Pac's actions that literally contradict even the crap Team Pac publishes/does. The he justifies the unjustifiable with more "reasonably logic driven" nonsense.

Most of these morons I completely understand where they are coming from. They are typical losers and Pac being a fraud literally wipes out their involvement with Boxing. I am just amazed at a person of a certain intelligence continuing to roll with this nonsense. How much BS happens before your Spider Sense kicks in?

 

Because out of the 3 players (Floyd, Pac & Bob) I actually believe Pac over the other two 100% of the time. All bull**** aside..... Everyone has blame in this fight not coming off soon enough but between Bob and Floyd its safe to say both share the blame equally...

We won't agree on this ****.... but I always have to read your **** because I know there's always depth to your views. Which is why I tend to read.....and not reply to your posts on this subject... unless Its something I completely disagree with you on.:yep. I pick my battles black.....You know boxing ... But you're still a *****:yep

 

There are two players. FMJ or Team Pac. The jury's out on who controls Team Pac. Pac (or his retreating behind Bob) has been the source of half of the nonsense. Equal? Wow.

Nah we won't, but as a study I find your reasoning ability and your surrounding yourself with these *******s fascinating. And you know you are still a *******

 

One of the risks of building the temporary stadium and securing funding from investors to do it, for this event, is that if either fighter gets injured during camp (ie. Khan opens up Pac's cut during sparring or he has adverse affects from the blood testing, Floyd's rib is re-injured, etc.) and the fight has to be pushed back, the stadium is sitting there not making any money, with investors expecting their money.

Also, the fact that Arum says it won't be completed until late May and Floyd has to report on June 1 means time (and money) is of the essence. If ANY issue arises that would delay this fight, it's possible it wouldn't happen at all this year. Again...risky, when you are dealing with investors' money. Securing the venue is an integral part in making sure this event happens with fewer risks of delays (due to construction). And there is no need to invest a large amount of borrowed superflous capital up front. The MGM is a solid venue and should suffice, IMO.

 

bald_head_slick,

What it is, is that KU99 is what you would call, in the classical sense, a 'bullshitter'.

As Harry Frankfurt so brilliantly described in [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Bull****"]his essay[/ame]:

This dude (and paulfv does this too) don't even care if what he says is true, rooted in any reality, or even makes sense. They don't even care if they blatantly contradict their own previous statements. Their entire mission is just to spread Pac 'bull****'.

This is what allows someone to spread the baseless claim that a bleacher based temp stadium based on the 1980's business model will make 3 times as much gate revenue as the highest grossing gate EVER. Even after they recognize the numbers are 'exaggerated' by double, it changes their position not one bit.

This is why I've kept my foot square off in his arse in this thread.

Can't bull**** me, G.

 

Dumb mother****er. You're one dumb mother****er lmfao. Your reverse psychology won't work you stupid mother****er!

 

Hilarious!!!

 

I'm not trying to get involved in this debate, but this line made me chuckle. :yep