Controversial statements on boxing that you stand by...

He doesnt hit harder than Walcott.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0hZKnQ07IE"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0hZKnQ07IE[/ame]

 

Rahman also didnt have as good a chin as Charles IMO.

 

Black=Boxrec warrior

 

that's not controversial

 

Black > FleaMan

Still bitter about being owned :-(

 

:rofl

 

just a sneaky punch, did louis loads of times...won the first fight against louis.

 

agree on that, rahman heart wasnt as big as the charles, walcott, rocky era..his will to win was less.

 

That doesnt really back up your point that Rahman hits harder than Walcott

 

what...i just said a lovely sneaky punch...was talking power.


wasnt trying to back up points just praising walcott.

 

was meant to be such not just..thats probably got ya

 

You are very confusing Black. It was a lovely punch as you said.

But after saying Rahman hits harder, you proceed to say that Walcott 'did Louis loads of times' which is strange. But you are right, Walcott was absolutely robbed in that fight (apparently, as only a bit of footage remains, including crowd reaction).

Walcott is seriously underrated IMO

 

got ya now :good

 

Thing is i feel rahman hits harder, now i could go and find a bunch of tapes but as we are online this wont changed your mind so fair enough. Walcott could hit, its a bit like a debate on shavers or foreman both very close in power.

Alot of fighters could learn from walcot tricks...lovely skills.