Why does Bhop diss Jermain Taylor & Kelly Pavlik so much?

Because he's a ****

 

Mad? No, this is how I talk to ignorant ass country bumpkins, and for the record I wasn't the one who said Hopkins ended GayT's career. I was just pointing out the irrefutable fact that he didn't "walk over" Hopkins by any stretch and that he's now about one more ass whoopin' away from permanent disability.

 

He says these things because he still has some of that ghetto criminal in him. He learned how to channel it into boxing and self - discipline, but still likes to dominate and own people beyond what the sport requires.

And Pavlik ruined himself with alcohol, in top shape against Hopkins he still would have lost but not in such a one - sided way.

 

the story of hopkins entire career at middleweight

 

Really? I didn't know Hopkins only had three title defenses at middleweight before getting knocked the **** out by Pavlik. Thanks for sharing, ****wit.

 

no **** head...smoke and mirrors...hopkins featsted on bums on smaller guys who were champs in lower weight divisions

DLH welter
Trinidad welter
carl daniels jr middle
john david jackson jr middle
simon brown welter
segundo m 18-2 dangerous 18 fight threat!
segundo m II 18-2-1
robert allen
robert allen II :shock:
robert allen III :rofl
steve frank 15-2 :tired
william bo james, lipsey, syd vanderpool, hakkar, - never was , never did
keith holmes- finally unifies and its against this ****ing guy?

smoke and mirrors as a middleweight, so STFU dummy

 

So now you're changing your story... Interesting. :think

 

Getting outclassed over a large duration of a fight, can often be more damaging than receiving a quick knockout. It makes you wonder if you’re really as good as you once thought you were. Tito, Pavlik, and I bet Pascal, are examples of fighters never being the same again after having questions asked of them by B-Hop.

 

i was just gone say you must have been listening to on the ropes boxing. every fighter claims another fighter is not the same once they have been in the ring with them. hopkins is right bout taylor and taylor is a bum, kelly is cool though.

 

SMH...cool story breh, so you're saying you believe 47 year old Hopkins knocks out JT, at 160, today?

 

Lets be honest, it couldn't possibly happen at 160.

Hypothetically, if Taylor did jump to 175 and get a re-match, he'd lose.

 

You mad *****? You can kick back put on some Rod Stewart and cry yourself to sleep, you can mumble all these mean things about Jermain and I under your breath while punching your pillow...hell maybe your mom will even make you some Chicken Noodle Soup, but it won't change the fact that JT owns your boy, you ****ing crybaby.

 

Just sign to fight Chad again so he can retire you already !

 

You are going on my ignore list.

 

Hopkin's is deluded, great technician, very good ring IQ but as a person he is not a nice guy, deep down. Great fighter in a poor era.

Great athletes/men are always gracious in defeat and victory, but Hopkin's seems to enjoying kicking people when their down (Pavlik) and can't accept defeat (Taylor) when they only have themselves to blame. Even Hamed has more class than this guy. Careful match-making has kept him relevant for the last 5 years, but sooner rather than later Hopkin's is going to get KO'd and when he does I am going to sit back and enjoy that moment.