*** 1973 George Foreman VS 2012 Ring Mag Top 10 Heavyweights!!! ***

Stick to the lounge bud.

In general you just sound like all the other deluded brittard Klitschko haters.

 

Don't be an idiot. How is it "hating" to say that a fighter widely regarded as one of the most fearsome heavyweights ever would KO Wlad who is a technically gifted fighter who has shown clear vulnerability to aggressive punchers?

Foreman who wiped the floor with Frazier, Norton, Chuvalo and as a fat old man, knocked out Moorer in 1994. The prime Foreman was a beast and this is a weak era. The specifics of Wlad are that he is hard hitting with a good jab and good skills, but he is vulnerable, and does not always deal well if he is backed up.

I also said that Vitali would have a chance due to his chin. There is no way Foreman could just hope to catch Vitali and turn the fight if he was losing. That is exactly what he could do with Wlad.

There is no hatred from me towards anything other than moronic fanatics of any fighter who somehow pretend that past era fighters are lesser or vice versa where every fighter from the past is viewed through rose tinted glasses.

Foreman hit harder than anyone Wlad has fought and would have been as aggressive as anyone he has fought. It is not hatred to simply look at how Wlad chooses to fight and at the times when he has been troubled and/or beaten and feel that one of the most powerful heavyweights of all time would KO him.

The fact that your post uses such asinine language as "brittard" tells me exactly how objective you are in regards to this issue. I picked Wlad to KO Haye. I picked Ward to thrash Froch. I am neither biased or fanatical about any aspect of the sport.

 

He beats them all easily. Hard to KO ten fighters in a row, even if you are completely superior to all of them.

 

People say Ken Norton was an all time great, when was the last time Wlad or Vitali lost to a 188 lb fighter? hmm interesting

 

Foreman wins all of the bouts.

Wlad gets demolished, probably before 2 is over.

Vitali gets beat into submission and unless he fights to survive is gone before 7.

All the rest of the fights would be a joke.

Keith

 

4man wood lyke dstroy every1 fiter who is heavywait

This is what you see on ESB all day everyday, replace Foreman with any other fighter pre-2000

 

Except that his hands are thousand of times slower, he's not a southpaw and 2012 Wlad fights nothing like he fought in 2003...but hey good comparison anyway :nut

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

6 foot (maybe just under) slow, plodding, crude prime Sam Peter managed to put Wlad down x3 and get to him regularly until he gassed

To suggest it would be beyond Big Georges skill is LAWLOLOLOLOLOL

Foreman actually was a monster. A lot of 70s era fighters can be overrated or their power overstated........but not him.

 

God some posters are stupid!atsch
Peter is 6'2" and was over 40lbs heavier than 73 Foreman.
It's shocking how little some socalled fans actually know about their sport.

 

Idiot,it has nothing to do with size. OK. If you ever fought you would know that you cant underestimate smaller guys because you'd get your ass whooped. Ken Norton was a WBC world champion(same title that Vitali has) and Ken beat Ali. He must have had some skill huh?

 

Foreman and Sanders are both 6'4" dumb ass. Foreman beat harder fighters than Wlad and Sanders. Foreman has fought every kind of fighter and KO'd most of them. Foreman would KO Wlad inside of 5 rounds. His body cant take it and certainly not his ***** chin. Foreman has knocked guys down with punches to the back! **** Off! Sam Peter who is not even that good had Wlad looking like a school girl and so did Ross Puritty ok. Foreman would kill Wlad badly. Really hurt him.