Is Pacquiao p4p the GOAT

This thread is a maass of confusion, i dont even know who I am anymore.

 

I would have calzaghe higher than pac.. but still not the GOAT

 

It's funnier when you understand the real meaning of what he's implying...

 

This guy is hilarious

 

Right, I ain't trolling now;

You are a spastic. Discuss.

 

If you use the criteria below you should have a Top 4 ATG as this;

1: Marciano
2: Calzaghe
3. FMJ
4: Sven Ottke

If you consider that none of these have been beaten, or look even close to be beaten then it's a fair assessment that they could have never been beaten.

People can suggest all they want about this and that, but there is no arguing with them 0's.

 

Wow. just wow

 

Calzaghe greater than Pacqiuao?!? What a mong.

May I suggest self immolation?

 

Agreed no arguing with the 0s, my Top 5 arnt all undefeated though because i base it on number of fights and strength of the oponents faced. Marciano you have a shout for though ill agree with you there.

 

Have you considered finding another Forum? :think

 

I don't consider number of fights, if I did then I'd have people with loads of losses on their record near the top and that just isn't right. You'd end up with journeymen like this Ezzard Charles bloke off boxrec near the top. Boxrec is all wrong, clearly all the muppets on here use it rather than using common sense. atsch



This Charles dude has like 40% losses.
[url]http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=9012&cat=boxer[/url]

 

I'm quite surprised that Roy Robertson was a top fighter in the 70's, because he genuinely did suck ass. What a pathetic era that was.