Arreola has now resorted to beating up cruiserweights

No one can say **** about Arreola fighting Molina as long as Wlad is fighting Mormeck.
Molina is taller and heavier than Mormeck and Chisroa. Molina has a KO record and is a genuine HW now. You dont have to be 245 to be good in this division. It's about skill not size. If size was all that matters,Valuev would have been undisputed.

 

It just goes to prove what I have always said. Arreola is all hype he's never even proven himself as a genuine contender by beating anybody who was even half decent. He lost to Adamek who got totally dominated by Vitali. Arreola in most era's would have never earned a title shot let alone 2.

 

Your post does not even make any sense stupid Brit.
So after all Arreola did not earn title shot in this era either?atsch
It was the Fight HBO pushed, money fight.

idiot You just did need to splutter your nonsense once again?

You and DrMo must be one of the biggest clowns in this forum who somewhat try to be credible poster whose brains are messed with their bias thou.

 

Molina doesn't have a single decent top 300 CW or HW win on his resume. Not even ONE.

Mormeck is a former world champion and has many decent wins, such as Bell, Ibragimov, and Oquendo.

 

"He has heart and comes to fight". What does that even mean? Does it mean that he has balls or what? Well, he had the chance of a lifetime against Vitali and he quit. Yes, he QUIT and cried on top of that. His resume is ****. He is ****.

 

You clearly did not fully comprehend my original post as you have lost the context of the point I was trying to make.

It doesn't mean a that Arreola got a title shot by simply being a draw, he still didn't earn his title shot on merit he was gifted it due to idiots thinking he was actually a decent fighter. Yes Arreola got a title shot but he did not earn it. Two completely different things.

You talk about bias yet you are the one getting so illogical and emotional that you have to insult another member of this forum by calling them a clown and stupid for simply giving their point of view. My original post seems dignified and well balanced compared to vitrioloic rant.

 

:deal

 

Is bad as that is its still better opponents than most past ATG's fought! Let's look at 10 opponents ATG Foreman fought

Joe Goodwin:
1-14-1

Clerence Boone:
3-22-1

Vic Scott:
1-2-0

Lou Bailey:
15-30-5

George Johnson:
17-18-4

Charley Polite:
11-14-3

Bob Hazelton:
3-6-0

Mel Turnbow:
8-10-0

Levi Forte:
19-21-2

 

Its harder to beat good cruiser weight than these bums he is facing, i dont know why he doesnt face better opposition...

 

Still watching boxing on boxrec i see try it on TV or youtube its great:good

 

George Foreman fought a lot of bums.

 

Do you realise you just ass raped your own logic?

 

I wish top 20 heavies fought each other for a change. Beating 5 bums convincingly guarantees them a fight vs. a Klits against whom they have precisely zero chance of winning FFS.

 

Nope :nono Adamek was over 200lbs at the time. That made him a heavyweight or did you change the rules on all of us? :huh

 

I don't have a problem with Arreola staying busy. He says he's commited to becoming the first Mexican-American HW Champ. When the Klitschko bros retire, he may just do that :good :bbb :yep