'Dark Lord' Adam Booth: The K brothers expect to be lauded as ATGs. I don't buy it.

Present your evidence that Tut's DNA is "European" or drop the braindead argument.

Youtube videos DO NOT CONSTITUTE EVIDENCE.

 

Here's three links, please read the evidence presented:

[url]http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/science/half-of-european-men-share-king-tuts-dna-swiss-researchers/article2116609/[/url]

[url]http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110802/king-tut-dna-european-110802/[/url]

[url]http://af.reuters.com/article/egyptNews/idAFL3E7J135P20110801[/url]

 

A film produced by the Discovery Channel does NOT constitute evidence that Tut's DNA is "European".

So, if said "researchers" didn't evaluate Tut's DNA - how then did they determine that it was "European"? Sorry but this does NOT constitute evidence either.

Again, films produced by the Discovery Channel do NOT prove that Tut's DNA is "European". We don't even know who made the film in question. Maybe it was the same "film" you posted earlier from Youtube? There is nothing scientific about the articles you just posted. All three amount the hearsay - NOT evidence. Who made the Discovery Channel film and what are their qualifications? What were their methods? What were their conclusions? Were their conclusions peer reviewed and published in a scientific journal? All of these questions need to be answered before you can even approach proving that Tut's DNA is "European".

Here's an even better question; Where is the study that was conducted on Tut's DNA? What were the results? Why did the "scientists" cited in your articles above not base their findings on said study?

You need to try again. The Discovery Channel and their "films" are NOT an Authority on the subject.

 

You are very slow to understand. :rofl Read those articles.


AND STOP DUCKING MY QUESTIONS:

1) Where are the ten poorest countries in the world?

(answer here: [url]http://shocking-news.org/economy/top-ten-poorest-countries-in-the-world/[/url] )

2) Why were there no civilizations in Sub-Saharan Africa? There were advanced cultures in other parts of the world such as Central and South America, China, India, etc.

 

Where is the evidence that Tut's DNA is "European"?

 

It's impressive for discussion about present day boxing but it will not secure Wlad's legacy. 14 fights is not enough to be called "dominance", especially when fights like Rahman, Thompson, Austin, Peter, Brewster etc., make up the list.

 

I've already answered that, with credible sources such as Canada's national newspaper The Globe and Mail and the respected world news agency Reuters.

Here's a video about King Tut and more information about his DNA from the American ABC:

[url]http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-08-02/half-of-european-men-share-king-tut-dna/2820322[/url]

Now, stop ducking my questions!

1) Where are the ten poorest countries in the world?


(answer here: [url]http://shocking-news.org/economy/top-ten-poorest-countries-in-the-world/[/url] )


2) Why were there no civilizations in Sub-Saharan Africa? There were advanced cultures in other parts of the world such as Central and South America, China, India, etc.

 

[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimbabwe_ruins[/ame]

[ame]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Aksum[/ame]

 

Wasn't that just one small fortress build by Arabs?

Aksum was founded by Semitic-speaking Sabaeans who crossed the Red Sea from South Arabia.

Don't believe everything you read on wikipedia, some people want to change history.

 

No

 

R1b1a2 = R1b1b2 = M269

IOW, they don't know when or where R1b1a2 came from - so the notion that it is somehow "European" has effectively been debunked - and with it your assertion that Tut's DNA is "European".

Come back when you have something more than a mystery "film" produced by the Discovery Channel to prove your point.

 

According to whom?

 

Tut's alleged DNA is NOT "European".

Try again...

 

And BTW, The Globe and Rueters are NOT scientific journals or recognized authorities on human DNA. Therefore, they are NOT credible sources where Human DNA is concerned.

You need to quote an AUTHORITY on the subject that backs your assertion.

 

Why were there no pyramids and other structures more than one story high in Sub-Saharan Africa? And I'm not talking about places farther along the Nile in Northern Sudan.

I'm asking about West Africa (the area where your ancestors came from) and Central Africa, and inland East Africa including areas away from the southern Nile.

Where are the ten poorest countries in the world? (Hint - you can find the answer at this site: [url]http://shocking-news.org/economy/top-ten-poorest-countries-in-the-world/[/url] )