Chael The Burglar Sonnen

Why be such a simpleminded troll? At least have a ****ing discussion like an adult. I've said several times that I gave the fight to Bisping, so my scorecard was the same as yours, you ****ing ******. atsch

But anyone who screams robbery in this fight doesn't know what the hell they are talking about, simple as that. So you have nothing at all to contribute except your usual witless trolling routine, which (literally) any 8 year old could do. Good work buddy. :roll:

I watched the card with a mate of mine who is just getting into the sport and has watched bits and pieces of maybe five UFC cards. He made several comments that were much more insightful than any of your pathetic attempted windups. :good

:hat

 

Chill out brah... I was just having a bit of fun to pass the time at work.

Yes Bisping won 2-1. Yes the first round was close but I still had Bisping winning it. Bisping won the 2nd and Chael won the 3rd.

30-27 is a joke. Chael never even came close to finishing Bisping.

Also since when have I been a "witless troll"?

Do you like my avatar? Should it have a WAR hat? :think

Lynchburg

 

damn haggis is on the rag today :-(

:hat

 

Don't wind him up or you will be a witless troll.

This content is protected

Lynchburg

 

See, now you are beginning to have a conversation.

After the fight, I ran some errands, then I came on here to discuss it.

But there was no discussion to be had. You were the only person around. And you were posting like a smartass bratty kid. You were saying nothing, simply trolling. Clearly you know enough about the sport to have a real, actual opinion, so why not talk about the fight like an adult? :huh You don't have to write essays, but you can make short posts that generate some sort of worthwhile discussion. That's what we are here for, isn't it? :conf

By your own scorecard, it's nothing close to a robbery. We scored the fight the same way. But in your own words, Chael won the third and "the first round was close." Well, I agree with your scoring right down the line. But plenty of people think that Chael won the first, and therefore the fight. And we watched it on TV with commentary and replays. Not at the arena, which is an entirely different viewing experience. Chael's work was getting a much better reception from the large crowd, which is one of the advantages of being the home fighter. That **** influences the judges who are caught up in the atmosphere of the live event. If the same exact fight happened in an English arena, Bisping more than likely takes the decision.

All of this is pretty clear-cut and obvious to anyone who has any knowledge of combat sports. That's a category of person which you fall into. So why not acknowledge at least some of it? Why not talk about the fight like an adult, instead of mindlessly chanting "Robbery" about a three-round fight that you yourself acknowledge was close? :conf

:hat

 

Lighten up haggis. Lynchburg will engage you in intelligent debate, just he doesnt take things as ultra seriously as some seem to on here. No need to fly off the handle at him

Gonna have to start calling you Raggis

:hat

 

I know what you are saying when you say it is different ringside. When I watched Froch Vs Dirrell live it looked like a Froch whitewash... almost a shutout but then watching it back it was a lot closer.

The same when Randy fought Vera... live I thought Vera ran away with it and I was shocked that Randy got the W but watching it back I can see why.

Last night:

Micky got taken by suprise at the start of the first. It wasn't really a TD but more of a "I'll fall down with you because I can get back up easier that way".

Then Chael tried to greco Micky against the cage but after some time spent with The Hammer years ago on TUF and also fighting him and Hollywood, Bisping has become pretty good at greco cage fighting and I thought he out greco wrestled Sonnen.

He also outstuck Chael in the first.

The second was all Bisping. Chael did little to warrant any judge scoring it to him. I'm not sure he won in any department... not even the great "Octogon Control" category.

The third was all Sonnen until the end.

This should have been a 5 round fight. Dana said that is what the new 5 round fights were for but then he does this? Weird...

Nevermind.

I hope they do not hold this L against Bisping and they give him the Maia fight next... on last night's performance he would take Maia or Munoz apart.

What say you?

Lynchburg

 

I had 1 and 3 for Sonnen. 2 for Bisping.

I thought the last round was the icing on the cake but it seems people find it tight. It was certainly very competative.

I said it pre fight, Bisping is hard to keep down and control him.

 

Chael took the first round and from there, the judges gave it to the sexier fighter.

Live with it ***gots.

 

30-27 Sonnen, couldn't see it any other way.

 

I wish you would post more often. You are a real gem to this forum. Thank you so much.

What do you think about this?

This content is protected

This content is protected

Lynchburg

 

You had two homosexual fighters in Anderson Silva and Demian Maia, lose control due to their lust for Mr Sexy and tried to force him to suck their diseased cocks.

Chael tapped out before their perverse gay tactics triumphed.

 

Bisping deserves a rematch with Sonnen more than Sonnen deserves a rematch with Silva. I thought Mick pulling them off the fence and restarting the action when Bisping had him pressed up against it trying to land strikes seemed harsh at the time. I haven't seen it again so that may not be a good insight on my part. I mean fighters are judged on octagon control, as they call it, right? When it goes this close on points and there has been stand ups by the ref they can make all the difference. I think a draw would have been the best result in terms of what actually went down in the ring but businesswise they got the right result. If Sonnen were to face Silva, and were he to win the title I think Bisping should be his first defence as long as he keeps winning between now and then.

 

I am not a fan of Bis or Fail.... If you look at the first...Fail took the Bis down but couldn't hold him...Bis out worked him to me won the first..but close..2nd was Bis and 3rd was and easy to Fail. Think Bis did the work to win..but 30-27?? A 2 year old could see that was a joke.

 

Big T ** Telling the truth since 2004

:deal

Lynch T