Khan must wait for rematch decision

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Mike Hunt, Jan 26, 2012.


  1. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
    Because this is how Boxing works.
     
  2. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,868
    Apr 19, 2010
    if the guy is struggling to make it in the most corrupt sport in history with the money men in his corner the future does not look to bright imo.
    the guy will spend more time dealing with appeals than actually in a ring
     
  3. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,350
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    If your talking pure boxing terms then I'd say Khan deserves an immediate rematch and Peterson deserves at 50/50 and in all honesty Peterson shouldn't have been 9/1 against. If you talk business and say AK's worth $20m then I think you'd agree he was stupid to take it in Washington and not winning a rematch could cost him a $15 bout against Mayweather.
     
  4. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,350
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Also on the buisness side, while some are saying Peterson is not the draw you have to factor in other thing. Khan could offer $1mil, Marquez $2mil, Pac $3mil. Lamont then has to decide which deal's best based on each purse and his potential to win and earn after each fight. Either way Khan has to/should make a strong offer.
     
  5. lirva

    lirva Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,335
    97
    Jul 7, 2010

    you have used being instead of BEEN a few times.
     
  6. widdy

    widdy lancs,where real men live Full Member

    5,747
    0
    Aug 19, 2008
    khan is not a big draw.full stop,he can't sell PPV full stop,why he should get the lions share is beyond me...............................
    the only folk who think he is are khan,his dumb as **** team that *** laz, darni kingcockkhan and a few more up his arse nutthuggers
     
  7. p.Townend

    p.Townend Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,400
    4
    Jan 14, 2009
    It is wrong,non of what has gone on since the fight is his fault.It should be at least 50/50.Khan deserves a rematch but the way he is talking it is as though he clearly won most of the rounds and got jobbed.It was not the case and he could quite easily lose again here.
     
  8. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Willy, you really are a silly prat, aren't you. :lol:
     
  9. widdy

    widdy lancs,where real men live Full Member

    5,747
    0
    Aug 19, 2008
    bless,ive upset the *** laz,whats the matter sweetheart,upset about you boy not being or ever being a big draw? fury got more on ch 5 than khan got against mcclosky,still smarts don't it **** for brains:hi:
     
  10. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  11. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    1
    Mar 11, 2010
    :lol: he's a full on cheese dick that Lazarus
     
  12. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,350
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    Good post p townend. I completely agree, boxing/business terms an even split rematch is fair but Khan has to realise he needs this. His fans can say what they want, but he isn't a massive draw. Tbh I think his career has been managed poorly lately. If he had all these bouts in the UK he'd probably have a huge fan base here like Hatton did.