Prime Sam Peter vs Joe Frazier, who you got?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Manning, Feb 1, 2012.


  1. Ummmm... Frazier woulda just beat Peter's ass for the full fight. Maybe even getting a late KO. Sam Peter at his prime literally never moved his head. Frazier's head movement and the left hook borne from the rhythm of his head movement is what made that ****er special.
     
  2. Guyfawkes

    Guyfawkes Than who was phone?! Full Member

    1,446
    8
    Jul 18, 2011
    Anyone who actually picked Sam "who necks" Peters needs to stfu and leave this ****ing site right now, then go to the store and buy some rope and hang yourself, the world has enough morons to cope with
     
  3. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Yet he wasn't too big for Eddie Chambers, who, if he wasn't a fat ****, would weigh about 210lbs?

    This is Chambers at 223lbs:

    This content is protected


    Chambers was barely bigger than Frazier, who had a better chin, better stamina, more speed, more power and so on.
     
  4. PKG

    PKG Member Full Member

    394
    0
    Aug 20, 2008
    Frazier wins this fight "EASY"!
     
  5. godlikerich

    godlikerich Active Member Full Member

    1,188
    1
    Aug 27, 2010
    Frazier has NO problem DESTROYING big heavyweights. Buster Mathis was 250lbs - way bigger than Frazier, and Frazier physically overpowered the guy and KO'd him. Size work against Peter here for three reasons. First, his stamina isn't great and he would fade later, second he would never be able to keep up with Frazier's work rate, and third Frazier would be able to use his smaller stature to get in close and pummel Peter up close. I have no doubt that Peter could hurt Frazier if he caught him, but to suggest Frazier couldn't hurt Peter is ludicrous - he could, especially to the body which is mostly fat in Peter's case. Joe KO in 10 after being hurt or even put down early.
     
  6. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    Peter is 6'2 and Joe was 5'11 1/2. Joe would have stopped him with a left hook within four rounds.
     
  7. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008

    George by no means was ultra slow back then. He was much faster then his comeback reign.
     
  8. Filthy McNasty

    Filthy McNasty Punchy Old Pug Full Member

    1,902
    2
    Mar 1, 2010
    :good
     
  9. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    Oh Manning, you delightful ****ing twat.
     
  10. Keueng

    Keueng Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,304
    1
    Jul 28, 2009
  11. Joe_MacKenzie

    Joe_MacKenzie Boxing Addict banned

    4,187
    0
    Nov 7, 2011
    The 70s heavyweights are very overrated.

    I think Sam Peter would stop Joe Frazier with a rabbit punch.
     
  12. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    Frazier batters Peter.
     
  13. DDDUUDDDEE

    DDDUUDDDEE Undisputed Ambien (taker) Full Member

    17,608
    23
    Oct 25, 2010
    Hey there, Hello, Goddag, Saluton, Hei, Bonjour, Guten Tag, Aloha, Ola, Hola
     
  14. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    this, maybe even earlier for joe, simply because joe's power punches would be landing on peter with more frequency than any fight peter has ever been in.
     
  15. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    Have you got a hangover today after your Birthday party? :lol: