What is the reason for some people's dislike of the Klitschkos?

so, who didn't like kelly pavlik? let me guess, black people? and what the hell is liberal ******ation and how does it apply to any of this? get your **** together.

 

"some" who simply dont like them?

 

at least speak good english if you're going to be involved in a full on debate. oh wait, your english is just like your arguement...broken:rofl. it makes perfect sense.

 

Ho no! Black people just loved Pavlik! They were crazy about him! Most said he was the middleweight GOAT!

 

sick sarcasm my man:blood. next level intellect on display by Bubby:happy.

 

English is my 3rd language that I am writing. Besides you fuked your grammar there as well. Well it makes sense too.:rofl

Anyways calm down man. I only said there is bias towards Klitschkos by certain boxing fans. it is nothing personal.:good
I believe when some time has pass they will be respected like Great Fighters should be.

I have watched Boxing since Iron Mike Came along. I was pretty young kid back then. I dont think These guys today are much lesser than back then. Everybody respected Tyson here Finland. Everybody knew him. Kings today Klitschkos. they are only known by hard core boxing fans only just by people who follow mixed sports. But they are still considered Great Boxers. I wonder why it is so much different there..

 

Yes, "some". There will always be "some" who don't like their skin tone, accent, where they're from or other non boxing related reasons. Than there are others, boxing fans, who don't think about those thing but judge them by how they are in the ring. Are they dominant? Sure. But as a boxing fan I think the era stinks. Do they have excellent ko percentages? Yes they do. But I still find them boring to watch besides the occasional Vitaly fight.

So again, why would you lump everyone who criticizes a Klit into the same category?

 

I post on these threads because I like ribbing bitches like yourself

1-800-dial-a-hoe

 

Just got a PM of your facebook photo! P-U!!

 

I knew English was not your first language! That is why you did not understand my earlier post. Here is the number in Finnish
1-800-Malibau-sucks-balls:deal

 

I don't dislike Wlad personally although I find his fighting style awfully boring. I don't think anyone could dare to claim he is an entertaining fighter.

Vitali on the other hand is a snake in the grass IMO. A steroid cheat, hypocrite, playground bully and quitter who has more faces than Big Ben.

If Vitali had any class whatsoever he would retire and let his brother build a real legacy for the next four or five years.

 

The last Pic is Classic . . . i that Bubby or Mailbu (or however you spell his name)

remember: 1-800-dail-a-hoe

 

Lol, you should see a picture of the guys mother who sent it to you! talk about P-U.....she smells like a rotting corpse!

 

Well attacking some ones mother is very cheap. So your not only fat and ugly and stupid, but your also a cheap person as well.

 

:rofl I fuked my grammar? where did I fuke my grammar? I did not fuke my grammar. anyway, that's your opinion, that whole klitschko opinion, and there have been heavyweights before tyson who were great, and after, and the klitschkos are great, but simply put, they aren't exciting. wladimir klitschko is exciting? you guys must enjoy observing prolonged, unnecessary beatdowns of physically and technically lesser fighters. Vitali has had a handful of good fights against contenders who can be considered top in this era, and the Lewis fight. that's it, and that isn't enough in my opinion.