Is It Reasonable to Have JMM Ranked Ahead of Pacquiao P4P?

Yes...

-JMM fights anyone...No mtach ups based on styles, no waiting for fighters to get old, no cherry picking, no excuses.
-JMM has moved up in weight and fought the best in every division, and he moved up to 147 fought PBF #1 P4P and lost, then he moved up fought the P4P#2 Pac and won.
-JMM was robbed 3 times against Pacquiao.
-JMM is the definition of P4Pness

 

He moved all the way up to 147 and beat Pacquiao.

 

Yes, it's 100% reasonable.

I have:
2. Pacquiao
3. Marquez
... but I can see it the other way around.

 

he lost thats why hes #3 p4p

peterson will really beat the crap out of him, and if juan is so good y did he lose to pacs leftover barrera:atsch

 

:thumbsup

 

troll..die fast :deal

 

opinion is opinion

 

The real question is
"Is It Reasonable to Have Pacquiao Ranked Ahead of JMM P4P?"

 

:good

 

Yes it is reasonable. These past years p4p rankings have become a joke pretty much to get on the list all you have to do is beat someone good.

 

Get the **** outta here.

 

No, because jmm did not beat him.

 

Yes JMM beat him in '11 and '08, he's also only lost to Mayweather aside from that. Pacquaio has avoided Mayweather and a 4th Marquez fight.

 

MArquez is the better fighter, simple as.

Unfort. Ring mag has him ranked #6 P4P - what the ****s that about?!?