The Klitschko Brothers - Two Of The Greatest Heavyweight Champions Ever Lived

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by volkan, Feb 4, 2012.

Page 7 of 19
  1. pirao666

    pirao666 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    2
    :rofl:rofl

    Comedy.
     
    pirao666, Feb 5, 2012
    #91
  2. Alien

    Alien Chin Scholar Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,384
    Likes Received:
    39
    What absolute rubbish. So it's one rule for every other boxer but another for Vitali.

    This bolded is the key. The ring had Vitali as #1, Byrd #2 and Sanders #3.

    Beating #3 does not establish lineage. It made him ring champion that's it.
     
    Alien, Feb 5, 2012
    #92
  3. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    30,315
    Likes Received:
    8
    Old senile dumbasses like Bert Sugar?
     
    RUSKULL, Feb 5, 2012
    #93
  4. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    30,315
    Likes Received:
    8
    Lennox was lineal no? Yes or no, simple question?

    Yes, he was & when Vitali beat Sanders he took over the reigns...............Byrd never had any part of the lineal title, because he never beat Lennox to get that title. Lewis is one of my AT favorite fighters but he was a major part of the reason we had the title split and we now need unification.

    You'll get over it eventually. :lol:
     
    RUSKULL, Feb 5, 2012
    #94
  5. Alien

    Alien Chin Scholar Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,384
    Likes Received:
    39
    You're not getting it are you. To establish a new lineage #1 must fight #2. That's been the rule forever.
     
    Alien, Feb 5, 2012
    #95
  6. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    30,315
    Likes Received:
    8
    Who exactly rated Byrd #2 at the time? Was it based on robbery decisions against Golota & Oquendo?

    Sanders was rightfully ranked number 2 because he beat Wladimir.

    BTW, Wladimir is lineal now.
     
    RUSKULL, Feb 5, 2012
    #96
  7. Alien

    Alien Chin Scholar Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,384
    Likes Received:
    39
    The ring obviously. But I guess the WBC rankings (who don't rank other belt holders) is more legitimate right?:rofl

    And no, Wlad is not the linear champion.
     
    Alien, Feb 5, 2012
    #97
  8. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,224
    Likes Received:
    2
    yeah, old senile dumbasses that have forgotten more about the game than you'll ever know, and other, more modern pundits. they know that you cant judge a fighter's status in the annals of history off of a fight that happens in your mind, unlike yourself.
     
    m8te, Feb 5, 2012
    #98
  9. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    30,315
    Likes Received:
    8
    Whatever makes you feel better about being wrong all the time. :thumbsup
     
    RUSKULL, Feb 5, 2012
    #99
  10. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    30,315
    Likes Received:
    8
    What matters is that Vitali fought the top WBC ranked guy for the belt Lewis, the former lineal, vacated.

    Thanks for playing, again.

    Oh, and Wlad is now Lineal, again wether you like it or not.
     
    RUSKULL, Feb 5, 2012
    #100
  11. Alien

    Alien Chin Scholar Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2011
    Messages:
    5,384
    Likes Received:
    39
    That is totally irrelevant.
     
    Alien, Feb 5, 2012
    #101
  12. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    30,315
    Likes Received:
    8
    To you maybe, but not to the lineage or history. :D
     
    RUSKULL, Feb 5, 2012
    #102
  13. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    30,315
    Likes Received:
    8
    Reading comprehension isn't your thing huh? I clearly said Schmeling didn't want the nazi mantle he was given...............are you really that ******ed?
     
    RUSKULL, Feb 5, 2012
    #103
  14. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Messages:
    10,224
    Likes Received:
    2
    :yep, because what you think of my opinions is the say all be all, because you spur me forward. my bad for not thinking the klitschkos are the greatest ever. proclaim that to anyone of note and get laughed out of the building.
     
    m8te, Feb 5, 2012
    #104
  15. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Messages:
    30,315
    Likes Received:
    8
    Again, I never said the Klits were the best ever. What is it with you haters & reading? :huh

    Now if one of them had both of their records they'd be the best ever :good I did say that part..............99 victories with 89 knockouts and only 5 defeats would clearly put that fighter at the top. Imagine if you considered all their combined successful defenses also? :rofl
     
    RUSKULL, Feb 5, 2012
    #105
Page 7 of 19