who is far more removed from his prime and the more damaged boxer, cotto or bradley?

cotto or bradley? vote....

 

more far?

 

*******s trying anything I see :rofl:rofl:rofl:roflnut

 

Cotto is damaged good. Pac destroyed him.

 

sorry just use more or far... mybad.

 

Bradley is in his prime.

 

Why these polls?!?

Next poll, who is closer to his prime... Tyson or Ali? :-((

 

thread starter is an idiot.

 

Cotto by far......BUT........I don't think his skills have diminished 10%. If anything he's lost a step, but partly b/c of his former struggles with weight.

Now that he's fighting at a better weight for him, I could see him handling 8 of the top 10 LMW's in the future. That is if Floyd is able to take his belt from him and hand him his 3rd loss. :deal

 

fact is that Cotto is still much better and more dangerous than Bradley will ever be. stupid *******s trying to save face.

 

Bradley is in his prime

though i see neither guy getting the upset here

 

first, obviously you have an agenda..

second, your question is so stupid.

third, i dont know why i bothered to post in your **** thread..

 

The T.S who I think is a total **** stool has no excuse for Morales who beat Pacquiaos ass while Morale was past his best. Cotto beat a man who possibly beat him using plaster in their first fight, and then stopped him in the rematch? It's my posts. I sting *******s with my truth and boxing wisdom.

 

Cotto is still a top ten fighter but went through two agonizing fights against Manny and Margarito I. Bradley is still fresh with no grueling fights under his belt. I will go out on a limb and say that Bradley will give Pacquaio a good fight.

 

floyd-cotto is still a better fight than pac-bradley, get the **** over it.