Why the **** is Amir Khan rated above Froch?

Boxrecs rankings are pathetic.

Bute was #1 in SMW for a while.

 

Exactly

 

Because Froch have a good resume but he's an overrated joke.

 

Frochs no joke! He scares the **** out of people the way he steams at you.

But its true that Amir is selling himself well, but Froch's a throwback to yesteryear, he just wants to get it on (though he talks good too). Froch would basically not duck anyone, hes like Hatton, that gets twice more respect than any amount of Sven Ottke defences.

Remember though that Froch is wrapping up his career now, whereas Amir is one of potential for the future.

 

Because anyone can clearly see that Froch has no skills.

 

C'mon, look at the perfect left hook from Froch, this is skill.

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

I think after Khan beat Judah he was generally considered the best in his division, even though now we know he's not. We can't say that about Froch, Froch is a top fighter but he's never realistically been considered the best in his division. :rasta

 

This content is protected

This is why...

 

:deal

 

That was a nice awkward uppercut Ward landed on the inside

 

Salita had faught literally no one noteworthy, he was a KO waiting to happen. The two fights arent even comparable, Johnson is a proven LHW/SMW and Salita is some bum who fed on cans for years. The way Khan beat him means **** all.

Khan looked like **** against both Peterson and Maidana, both B level fighters. He looks good on the outside but sooooo **** on the inside. Even McClosky made him look **** and all he did was move his head, wasnt Khans connnect percentage 10% in that fight?

 

They are both very similar skill wise....but khan is far faster and more athletic, which is why he is better imo.