The all things technical thread.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by slip&counter, Feb 5, 2012.


  1. Jdsm

    Jdsm Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,184
    1
    Aug 8, 2010
    Pretty much just took a lot of what I was about to put in my next post :lol::thumbsup

    The way he extends the glove and controls range is fantastic. The movement of the extended glove and the bizarre feints (Vitali is also a master of them) works great.
     
  2. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    19
    Jul 23, 2008
    I think even though Wlad is better technically in a lot of ways. What Vitali does better is he gives you a turn and a different look. Wlad tends to go in straighter lines, while Vitali stands off centre. He also fights tall extremely well and is very awkward which makes him hard to find. Along with being tougher and MUCH stronger on the inside and mentally. I'm a fan of both brothers.
     
  3. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    19
    Jul 23, 2008
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GR-kuFNSXrA[/ame]



    And for left hooks to the body check out Ruben Olivares.
     
  4. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    19
    Jul 23, 2008
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IBBiQx8bMDU[/ame]


    I've watched as much footage of Ray Robinson training as possible and i always notice how simple his training routines were. Nothing convoluted or complex. He thrived on the basics and then doing his calisthetics. Notice how much he's working the bags in his workouts and he never used pads. Oh and no one jumped rope like he did. He even works his pivots and turning on the toes when he was skipping.
     
  5. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Pads didn't exist that's why dude
     
  6. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    19
    Jul 23, 2008
    There is the argument that if they'd been available then they would've used them, but many old school trainers and fighters were not fans of using them even when they became available. They believed it had limited teaching potential and didn't encourage a fighter to be imaginative and instinctive. They can be a bit smoke and mirrors if the trainer doesn't know what to look out for and correct. Some people can look great on the pads when in fact it's not really doing much for them.

    Pads have their place, they're very important and everyone should do them. But they should be a supplement and not a substitute. I think overusing the pads is not good and it does encourage some flaws like poor punching technique, pitter patter punching etc. Much of the stuff you get from the pads you'll get the same and more from working the variety of bags, plus you'll develope your power. Some trainers don't get their fighters to follow through the target with pads for example. Manny Steward is the one who probabily uses it the best, no wonder he has a reputation for working with punchers. He's another trainer who isn't THAT big a fan of the pads if they're not used in a certain way. Nacho Beristein is another great trainer who doesn't particularly like them. Think of some of the things his fighters are known for...

    The pads/mitts are great. But just think about this. They're meant to get you improving things like your combination punching, right? Well the greatest combination punchers in the history of the game NEVER used them. That's not an argument for ditching the pads, but it's at least some food for thought i think.
     
  7. norfolkinchance

    norfolkinchance Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    1
    Mar 28, 2009
    I think pads are essential if being used properly and would improve any boxer of being used properly. they encourage better technique and a good pad holder gets instant feedback about how hard hisd man is punching.
    padwork should be about repition of certain combos imo until they arebeing done perfectly. eg 1 round of just one or two combinations which link together nicely.
    a good padman will also replicate a fight by actually thrwoing punches with the pads on like someone would in sparring and then the boxer has to deal with them eg slip or parry and then counter.
    i woulkd also like the padman to constantly have a body bag on and then the boxer can finish his combos with bodyshots too to encourage the natural throw of body shots as and when he likes.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xx7rRBZW9Io&feature=related[/ame]

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEV6UvBxQhI&feature=related[/ame]

    some good examples of the sprt opf padwork im talking about.
     
  8. Lunny

    Lunny Guest

  9. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    19
    Jul 23, 2008
    :good

    Spit some of that knowledge, Lunny.
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,463
    Sep 7, 2008
    I'm very much of the opinion that pads do not encourage punching through the target. Coupled with efficiently made, 'safe' 8oz gloves and less proficient trainers, probably add up to why their aren't many 'punchers' nowadays.
     
  11. norfolkinchance

    norfolkinchance Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    1
    Mar 28, 2009
    too many trainers really slap the pads into the boxers glove which mistakenly gives the imptression they are punching harder than they are. if the oads are held relatively static then in encourages more punching 'through' the pad. imo of course
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,463
    Sep 7, 2008
    No that's a great point and corresponds with what Slip was saying about Manny's 'proper' use of them :good
     
  13. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Pads are so helpful if you get a good pad man.
     
  14. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    19
    Jul 23, 2008

    'If used properly' being the operative words i think. You only have to see what Roach has done with Pacquaio on the mitts to realise how effective they can be. Getting him to spin out properly etc. But i think a lot of trainers play patta with pads. They don't know how to get the best out of it.

    I like the freestyle approach to padwork, where the trainer lets the fighter throw the punches HE wants. Not what he's instructed to throw. That can make the fighter a little robotic. The other way encourages the fighter to THINK and not just be reactive but be proactive.

    Padwork can be a little like microwave popcorn. They're portable and trainers can be a little lazy in just getting them out neglecting other things.

    I don't wanna sound like i'm against using the pads. But it's interesting that there's never been a time when they've been used as much as they are now, and there has never been a time when technical refinement, combination punching and knockout punchers have been at such a premium.
     
  15. I think you're more bothered about hitting the mitt than you are about actually trying to punch properly.

    Take part in or watch any boxercise class and that's obvious.