If Wladimir Klitschko goes undefeated for 2 more years..

Not at all, are you angry when the bros continue to win?

 

I agree.

 

Louis fought in a time when there were more professional boxers in New York city than there are in the entire world today. And 6 belts just means an extremely watered down division. I will give credit for Wlad being able to juggle his titles, but times today aren't like back in the 80's, the ABC orgs are more willing to work more with multiple titled champion today.

 

Vitaly is not a champion, he's a paper titlist. Wlad is the only champion at heavyweight today.

 

I think I did acknowledge a mistake in one of my posts.

I am still curious on where you get the redneck from. Most Klit fans assume I am black because I don't agree that they are the greatest ever.

And as for your inability to handle the english language, I find it amusing that when has no valid points to make and resort to personal attacks alone especially on anothers mental strength, that they cannot spell or do it in an intelligent matter. It's quite ironic.

Keith

 

this who era is "bum of the month"

 

Yeah the irony is, the longer the two brother's stay boxing, the more wlad moves further and further ahead of big brother.

 

talking about irony.
Did you skip your english classes?
At least i have an excuse for my occasional misspellings; english is not my 1st language, but you.....you come up with your own version of english.

It's pointless to talk to you on an intelligent tone because everything would go right over your head.


Lennox TKO6 Vitali...just stick to that ******.

 

one missed word.


Yet all used correctly.

You have never had an intelligent post. Just your cyberstalking rants.

I will take it as a compliment that you find me some big game to chase down.

I hope you are impressing your fellow Klit lovers.

Now hug your Wlad pillow and go night night. the adults are talking.

Keith

 

I like wlad more than vitali, but i think wlad will retire before vitali. I can see vitali going for another 6 years easy. The man just doesnt get hit, let alone hurt in his fights. He has only wear from one fight really, and is healed from the shoulder. He even had a few years retirement to relax. He just seems so much more durable than the more fragile wlad. Wlad is clearly the better boxer, but he's softer, as evidenced by his losses. He can be hurt, and is smart enough to know this and when to hang it up, much like Lewis. Vitali on the other hand, is also smart enough to know for how long he won't get hurt, and will carry on accordingly. Look for Vitali to be the one to inevitably unify the title, in 4 or so years after wlad retires.

 

It makes him the greatest HW of the worst HW division in the history of boxing.

To be considered an ATG you need to have great fighters on your record. There are none sorry make that one maybe in Lewis and Wlad lost that fight no matter the scorecards when the TKO happened.

What's his defining fight to date? Lewis TKO 6.

Don't get me wrong it's not his fault there are no decent challenges out there. He just came along when the HW division happened to be at its worst.

 

Vitali fought Lewis...atsch

 

Apart from mixing Wlad up with Vitali, I agree. And the same goes for both anyway. Fact is you cannot be an ATG, when your best wins are against Haye and Peter. Vitali could be the greatest of all time, but we will never know because he has only been tested once. Wladimir can never be an ATG because he was badly beaten by 3 journeyman, when he was in his peak years.

 

You don't have to beat a great to become a great; that's totally nonsensical when analysed.

Wlad is great by virtue of his dominance. Larry ruled a **** division also but I wouldn't refrain from calling him a great.

 

That's cute, now **** off.