Cleverly Is the definition of PAPER Champion and...

proof that WBo = ****** Boxing Organisation....I mean this guy has only fought some mediocre calibre opposition, its almost as Bad as Calzaghes so called 20 defences...F****** really has franisco Varcacel in his back pocket..

 

Says he wants Hopkins in summer

 

Not too loud, you might spark the new breed of threads explaining to you the greatness of Joe or how he should be #1 GOAT.

 

that privilege goes to Chavez jr, cleverly fought murat whos not bad.

 

Hopkins Pavliks him. Real bad.

However I doubt Wawrrren puts up enough money for BHop to bite.

 

His world champion credentials are still to be proved to me. I do like him though I think he is good to watch and will be able to beat world rated fighters when those fights are made. I personally think he beats Tavouris Cloud, all we need is Frank ****** to have enough balls to make the fight.

When I think of paper champs i dont instantly think Nathan Cleverley though, its usually Chavez Jr or Povetkin these truly are stupid titles...

 

I agree Clev does not have the boxing brain to beat Bernard Hopkins, even a 50 yr old one.

 

you think if cleverly stood square or tried to fight in the pocket with cloud, he'd survive 12 rounds?

 

Every title he has ever won has been vacant, British, CW, Euro & WBO.

 

Well I watched the first 4-5 rounds of last night and then turned it off but the fact he didn't KO Him is wierd

He showed heart in the Bewell fight and they both tough nuts to crack IMO

Cloud VS Bewell/Cleverly would be interesting

 

He's got a degree ya'know

 

Yes in mathematics I believe

 

British fighters tend to get overhyped A LOT.

 

******* cost me an accumulator. How do you not get a stoppage against a nurse in your own hometown with a British ref?

 

paper champion has nothing to do with the level of competition even though cleverely is a paper champ.

a paper title means a title won on paper i.e a vacant title without beating the title holder.