Starting to think Floyd doubts himself against Pac.

no, it was pacs camp. and dont u remember? PAC wanted Cotto first but he turned him down for Floyd. Floyd aint got no time to waist with Arum and Pacs filp floppin bull****. he had to set up a fight before he went to jail. and team pac and Arum knew it.

 

I've covered this multiple times and you have even asked me this same question multiple times and I gave the same answer every single time. Go look and read one of those responses and that's your answer :good

 

Floyd has memories of when Castillo tapped his ass all night whenever he thinks of PAC..

 

what, u mean another robbery?

 

All he have to do is take the test and we have a fight.

-Floyd (2010, 2011)





Pacquiao, take the test!

-Floyd (Feb 2012)

 

he was just a different fighter back then, a potshot artist. hes a lot more aggressive now. i think hes just really concerned about keeping his o. he luvs that shite

 

Yep I feel u man. I remember watching Floyd vs Oscar and being surprised that the ho actually fought him. After the beating Castillo put on him, I'm surprised he didn't retire.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1Uf_-fy-Ik[/ame]

 

Ok now tell me why a man will turn down a fight for the biggest payday of his career, and would boost his legacy so much more than any other fighter...not to mention this is all against an Asian midget that would clearly be an easy fight. And he's doing this knowing he will AGAIN be called a Ducker by everybody that's not either a 1)****** 2) idiot or 3) ******...your special cuz you meet all of those. Only explanation...he's scared! You can show all the highlights you want, but Floyd's action says it all. :deal

 

Floyd didn't turn it down Manny did. atsch By the way "we didn't even get to talk about the back end."

 

He offered him $40 million flat rate...**** what Floyd says now, he's already fighting Cotto so it don't mean ****. Besides it was 50/50 for three ****ing years atsch

And yeah you'd turn the fight too if some jealous mother****er was trying to rob you of your money.

 

Yeap castillo 2....vid....expected.:roflatsch


try castillo 1...

This content is protected

 

A close one-off can be argued as a robbery or a scoring anomaly, but if it's three then you can say that there's a pattern; a consistent way of fights being scored favoring Pacquiao's style against another style. 3 close fights against JMM suggests that despite those fights being close, there's something about Pac's style that scores points and wins over judges. To a fanboy on the losing end, of course, one would expect cries and moans of robberies...but to a rational person seeing the big picture (such as a boxing trainer), being on the short-end of a very close decision against Pac is a very real concern. If you evaluate all 3 Pac fights against JMM, there's a recurring pattern---Pac wins the early rounds, loses the middle ones, then comes on strong at the end. All this claims of Pac being outboxed, yet people forget that it is Pacquiao who ultimately wins championship rounds in these fights and ultimately wins the decision from the judges.

 

Well said..:good

 

You are basing your opinion off of what Pac said and that is fine. Floyd even said he offered Manny that up front but he also said that they didn't even get to discuss the back end money which is the PPV money. You seem to not want to mention that part which is fine. Yes the fight should be 50/50 but the fact of the matter is that Arum should have answered the calls from Shaefer so that they could negotiate and work all this ****. They are all at fault and if you can't admit that then you clearly have an agenda.

By the way you and I know that if Floyd agreed to 50/50 then this fight would still not have happened yet. "Even if Floyd agreed to 50/50 we are still not fighting right now." Bob Arum:deal

 

:rofl:rofl