Liston over Marciano - Can Anyone Sanely...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Jul 5, 2008.


  1. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,655
    2,133
    Aug 26, 2004


    I disagree Williams is mostly myth, a Puncher to me is someone that has proven they can KO quality, being able to punch like David Rodriguez against fighters with losing records and proving it against a top guy is 2 different things we can not assume a guy was a great puncher with no proof, now Lyle could punch he was strong but in many fights could not Ko a guy with his strength and struggled, he was not a pinpoint puncher but the proof is in the pudding and being classified as a top puncher to me means you had to KO some quality to be an elite puncher

    ...Lyle's big KD was over Foreman but remember Jimmy Young also had Foreman on the floor. Could they punch yes but there not on my Top punchers list because they did not prove it and that is where we differ in opinion.
     
  2. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,655
    2,133
    Aug 26, 2004


    I disagree Williams is mostly myth, a Puncher to me is someone that has proven they can KO quality, being able to punch like David Rodriguez against fighters with losing records and proving it against a top guy is 2 different things we can not assume a guy was a great puncher with no proof, now Lyle could punch he was strong but in many fights could not Ko a guy with his strength and struggled, he was not a pinpoint puncher but the proof is in the pudding and being classified as a top puncher to me means you had to KO some quality to be an elite puncher

    ...Lyle's big KD was over Foreman but remember Jimmy Young also had Foreman on the floor. Could they punch yes but there not on my Top punchers list because they did not prove it and that is where we differ in opinion.
     
  3. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,639
    Dec 31, 2009
    on film only westphal was iced but all other Liston victims were not "out" like walcott was against marciano. layne was out. Louis was out. mathews out. I would say at elite level marciano iced more top fighters, hes the better puncher because he landed his power sweeter on top fighters.
     
  4. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,250
    9,083
    Jul 15, 2008
    Louis was not out, LaStarza was not out , Charles was not out, Cockell was not out, Moore was not out ... regardless it's not who hit harder shot for shot (although I favor Sonny) .. it's who will land more often and faster ...
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,504
    46,991
    Mar 21, 2007
    That's fine, and you're entitled to your opinion, but it reaches a point where the massed ranks of peers and experts arrayed in opposition to you is always going to make that opposition a little weak. It's not even as if Williams is regarded as a great puncher in retrospect - he was seen as a huge puncher and an avoided fighter (in spite of his flaws, which were many) because of this in his own time.

    And although Ring are wrong to list him amongst the top 40 punchers in all of history, the opinions of the men who shared a ring with him and the regard he was held in by the press of his era means I understand why they made this mistake (if it is one).

    Then we are arguing also about semantics. I'm talking about a puncher as someone who could punch very hard. Do you accept that Williams could punch very hard, or not?
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,504
    46,991
    Mar 21, 2007
    I don't remember his writing that; if he did, I wouldn't dismiss every other sourced passage because of it. Throwing everything a given writer contributes because of one mistake (if he made it) is rash.
     
  7. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    81
    May 30, 2009
    Oh dear God let it stop. :lol:

    On what basis, a 100% H2H criteria?
     
  8. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    MAYBE in an IMAGINARY-WORLD where tiny lightheavy featerfist bums Marty Marshall And Leotis Martin did not whup that OVERRATED SPINELESS BULLY?? :think:think
     
  9. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    81
    May 30, 2009
    :rofl :deal

    I don't care what anyone says Foreman Hook, you're alright. Keep doing you. :good
     
  10. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,655
    2,133
    Aug 26, 2004

    It was not proven that Williams was a puncher against quality opponents, a lot of these so called experts are still learning, guys like Max Kellerman and as far as the Ring magazine it has not been good since Nat Fleischer died, I new them all, Nat Loubet was Fliechers brother in law and ran the wresting and John Ort who Don King bribed for the ratings fix was Loubets son in law. You want to call them experts but I knew them and knew better.

    As far as Lyle he was a decent puncher not a killer puncher. Watch his tapes, look over his fights, the win over Shavers was typical of Shavers losses run out of gas and get stopped, Ron Stander was the 1st to stop Earnie, he could not budge Quarry and Jerry dominated him. Again you keep quoting the Ring magazine as gospel but other than Nat Fleischer none of them knew boxing. It was in the Gyms of NYC and outside the fights when the sharp minds used to gather and talk, the promoters like Russel Petlz of the Phillie Spectrum, the trainers like Freddie Brown, the inside guys, the writers like Flash Gordon and one of the best promoters that ever lived Teddy Brenner ran the shows and that is where I saw a different point of view and a different way of looking at boxing.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,433
    44,202
    Feb 11, 2005
    I have thought over this Head to Head match-up for many a year and I still think Marciano has a very good chance on winning this... and ending it before 15.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,504
    46,991
    Mar 21, 2007


    This really hasn't answered my question. Ring said that Williams is one of the hardest punchers in history, top 40, all weights p4p. I think that's over-egging it - for the fourth time - but it seems pretty obvious that Williams was a pretty hard puncher.

    Are you saying Williams wasn't a hard puncher? This isn't about the expertise or otherwise of the ring, nor is it about William's paper resume. It's a very specific question about a given fighter's attribute.

    Was Williams a hard puncher?

    When??? Can you answer this question please? From memory, i've stressed throughout the thread (I think five times now) that I consider the Ring list in excess of the reality, not "gospel" at all.

    Pardon me, but that is ridiculous. The idea that every single Ring journalist didn't know boxing is preposterous.
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,182
    20,849
    Sep 15, 2009
    Not worth debating the power because I don't see it as being debatable.

    The point of debate in this matchup is who's cumulative power will count for most. If rocky lands an extra 5 power shots a round, will it be enough to surpass the damage liston is inflicting?
     
  14. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,639
    Dec 31, 2009
    without a doubt!
     
  15. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,639
    Dec 31, 2009
    That would be rocky. he had more work rate and was harder to hit clean as well as having the better jaw. Often if two punchers meet the guy with the worst whiskers lucks out. Often when two punchers meet it is the guy with the better engine who wins. Often a good big man beats a good little man, but at 1 inch shorter just how little was marciano? At age 24-29 Liston was 198 natural pounds and at his title winning best he was but 10lb heavier than joe walcott who could not force rocky back.old joe louis was the same size as Liston, whilst not as great a fighter as liston at that point louis's size did not factor at all against marciano.