If Wladimir was able to destroy Mormeck as easy as that what chance did Frazier stand

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ryan O'Reilly, Mar 3, 2012.


  1. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,945
    8,608
    Feb 11, 2005
    Sure it does. The mere fact that this fight doesn't play in the exact same manner than Klit-Mormeck did means that the exact same result won't take place. It's an entirely different type of fight for Klit when confronted with someone who actually comes in behind punches than someone who doesn't.

    It's either a variation of Foreman-Frazier (which involves Klit showing more aggression than he normally does) or Frazier-Bugner (where Frazier was able to establish his attack against a taller, bigger opponent who liked to hang back and work off the jab).

    But either way, Mormeck is hardly the best point of comparison to use in this situation.
     
  2. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Not saying Wlad wouldn't beat Frazier, but to compare the GREAT Joe Frazier to Mormeck is offensive.
     
  3. Dee

    Dee Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,217
    3
    May 21, 2011
    Here we go again.

    Frazier > Chisora > Mormeck = Klit World.

    So where does Haye fit into this considering he beat Mormeck?

    This is a ridiculous thread from a ridiculous poster. I have 400 posts because I have made 400 valid points.

    You post out of some kind of need to have an insane level of posts on here - So that MAYBE, Just MAYBE, people might actually take you and your views seriously.

    :patsch
     
  4. It saddens me that these mother****ers dont know what Joe was.
    Joe was tougher than anyone,stronger than Mormeck by far with zero fear and a ton of determination. Frazier was plenty big enough to fight anyone.
    Once again size does not matter. If that was really Tyson in there today fighting Wlad,Wlad would be killed in one. Tyson could come in at 215-220 and brutally stop Wlad no problem. It's not the size,it's the skill you ****ing idiots. Frazier bates Wlad to a bloody pulp in 6 or 7. ****ing Klitschko fans dont know **** about boxing and most of them have never taken a hit.
     
  5. perko

    perko Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,808
    7
    Nov 3, 2010
    frazier only has to land one good fabled left hook on vlads whiskers , then its tiiiiiimmmmmbbbbbeeeerrrrr.
     
  6. and another thing,Wlad is no George Foreman either. George Foreman was the hardest hitting mother****er ever. George was raw and wild without much boxing technique and he managed to KO guys in the 60's,70's,80's and 90's. Wlad is a strong mother ****er yeah but dont pretend he is George Foreman a 2x lineal champ and fellow Olympic gold medalist.
     
  7. Jacory Harris

    Jacory Harris I'm a gorilla I'm a dawg! Full Member

    7,906
    32
    Dec 30, 2009



    :patsch Damn, Joe was a horrible athlete. Made the brothas look bad. LMAO though, at a white, scrawny pole vault champion beating him in the weight lifting competition. :rofl
     
  8. pit

    pit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,159
    6
    Jul 25, 2004
    Your comparing Mormeck to Joe ????:lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  9. The Predator

    The Predator Active Member Full Member

    1,119
    1
    Jun 22, 2008
    Joe Frazier was throwing punches to start with. had better headmovements and was there to fight. Klitschkos are stiff and mostly throw straight punches and are not very fast. Frazier came inside with a lot of movements and had several combinations. One thing that surprises me is that people looking at Klitschkos today are so impressed, im not. They are slow and doesnt put so much punches together. None of them should beat Frazier who would destroy their ribs and then go for their head. Vitaly had problems with Chisora as soon as Chisora throw more than one punch at a time. Frazier would beat them both with heart, skills and power.
    Mike Tyson is even worse for both the brothers since he is faster, has more teqnique and more power than Frazier. Finally Muhammad Ali would beat them both at the same time, to fast, to smart and way to skillfull. Klitschkos are good sportsmen but not that good boxers compare to some of the old time greats, they are just in pretty good in probably the worst era in the HW history.
    Cheers :)
     
  10. 2ironmt

    2ironmt Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,903
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    mormeck didn't deserve to be in the ring, no wonder he was outclassed. the fight was a complete and utter joke and so's this thread (tho i'd favor wlad over frazier)..... mormeck's best days were 6 or so years ago at 200 (or was it 190 back then).
     
  11. Hands of Iron

    Hands of Iron #MSE Full Member

    14,701
    16
    Feb 23, 2012
    I feel you.

    Although I scoff at any comparison between Frazier and Tyson whatsoever. They share very little in common aside from a lack of height. Frazier was a true inside fighter, Tyson was really more of a midrange puncher. Frazier had better inside skills, higher workrate and presumably more heart. Tyson was bigger, stronger, much more powerful, significantly faster, significantly better combination puncher, counterpuncher, superior finisher and had dynamite one-punch KO power in either fist.
     
  12. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    It's a troll thread anyway. Comparing prime ATG HW to a shot never been that good CW
     
  13. Whipdatass

    Whipdatass Boxing Junkie banned

    9,353
    2
    Aug 18, 2011
    Todays boxing fan doesn't know **** snout boxing. Pacquiao and Klitschsko fans are the worst fans in boxing now.
     
  14. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,540
    5,929
    Mar 8, 2008
    ****ing troll
     
  15. Jimbob

    Jimbob Active Member Full Member

    1,142
    1
    Mar 14, 2009
    The current heavyweight division is as sad to watch as this forum is to read.