Nigel Benn vs Mikkel Kessler

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RJJFan, Mar 4, 2012.

  1. RJJFan

    RJJFan Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    14,002
    Likes Received:
    6,970
    How do you see this fight going?

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  2. beatsy

    beatsy Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mikkel is a classy guy but Benn was ferocious...7th rnd ko
     
  3. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    11,933
    Likes Received:
    10
    Kessler is Iron Chinned Benn on points
     
  4. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,798
    Likes Received:
    3
    :lol:

    Kessler was the superior fighter in every way. At 168 he probably even hits harder.
     
  5. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    10,275
    Likes Received:
    21
    Kessler a little too predictable I feel.Benns decent upper body movement and fast, ferocious attacks would give him a points win. Kessler is a very live underdog here though.
     
  6. ingredientity

    ingredientity Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    1,078
    Likes Received:
    2
    England V Denmark this time around, eh?
     
  7. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2004
    Messages:
    36,467
    Likes Received:
    21,045
    Nah
     
  8. CubanHeel

    CubanHeel Guest

    Kessler is a better boxer than Benn but Benn has many years of nostalgia points built up and Kessler just can't compete with that.
     
  9. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,798
    Likes Received:
    3
    Hell yeah. Benn was not (I repeat NOT) a particularly big puncher at 168.

    Anyone with an opposing viewpoint had better bring some evidence to back it up. And I guarantee that noone can come up with something (either footage or statistics) that is even remotely convincing.
     
  10. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,798
    Likes Received:
    3
    That's exactly what it is :lol:
     
  11. Jasper Simone

    Jasper Simone Veteran Traveller Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    1
    It wasn't as if he lacked power at 168. He could still hurt the best of them and his opponents had respect for his power, no doubt.
     
  12. BatTheMan

    BatTheMan Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2008
    Messages:
    6,416
    Likes Received:
    0
    Benn had a glass jaw. Easy KTFO for the dane.
     
  13. Jasper Simone

    Jasper Simone Veteran Traveller Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    1
    No. And No.
     
  14. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,798
    Likes Received:
    3
    He wasn't a weak puncher, and his punches had enough authority to get respect. He was capable of hurting opponents that lacked durability, but even that was mainly due to attrition, and he sure as hell wasn't this power-punching dynamo that people actually seem to believe.
     
  15. Jasper Simone

    Jasper Simone Veteran Traveller Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Messages:
    416
    Likes Received:
    1
    He wasn't a Julian Jackson type hitter but he punched hard enough to hurt and stop most of his opponents. The ones he didn't stop certainly didn't hang their chins out to get tested by him either. His power was very good and very respected at that time.