Lennox's arsenal and overall boxing compare to WK

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ayatollah, Mar 5, 2012.


  1. Ayatollah

    Ayatollah ESB's Godliest poster Full Member

    6,196
    3,593
    May 13, 2005
    Lennox:
    1- Better resume vs opponents overall
    2- Better movement
    3- Hits harder in both hands
    4- Monsterous Uppercut
    5- Better balance
    6- Better killer instinct
    7- More exciting to watch
    8- Better inside fighting game
    9- Better fighting mentality
    10- Overall smarter in the ring.
    11- Similar hand speed

    Wlad has nothing better than Lennox EXCEPT:
    1- Short left hook on inside
    2- Hook off the jab (when he used to do that)


    I say:
    Left Hooks are similar
    Jabs are about the same
    That's it.

    Am I wrong?
    Discuss
     
  2. 12downfor10

    12downfor10 Guest

    I'd argue that wlads foot speed is better, his right hand is harder to read and his control of distance is better.
     
  3. hammers571

    hammers571 Guest

    Wlad Klitschko would give any heavyweight in history a good fight and have a chance of beating them. He's an Olympic Gold Medalist and a Long Reigning world champion who just happens to be in a poor era of heavyweight boxing. He'd beat all the heavyweight pre 1980's just due to his size alone. Ali, Frazier, Liston, Louis and so on were fantastic boxers but wouldn't be big enough to trouble Wlad. As for Lewis I think he'd probably Knock Wlad out around rounds 8 or 9 which shows just how highly I rate Lewis.
     
  4. Ayatollah

    Ayatollah ESB's Godliest poster Full Member

    6,196
    3,593
    May 13, 2005
    I respectfully disagree regarding his foot speed.

    Just because he "jumps" faster than Lennox, doesn't mean his overall foot speed is better.

    Lennox seems so natural when he moves and uses lateral movments, and steps asise to throw the uppercut etc..

    also, Lennox use of his jab imo is far more paced than Wlad's at controlling to throw the right hand.

    Maybe Wlad's right hand is faster than lennox. but Lennox's is more lethal and deadly.
     
  5. 12downfor10

    12downfor10 Guest

    I don't think wlad's footwork is as refined or as versatile as lennox's was, in fact I think wlads is fairly basic but he is remarkably swift for such a big dude. But I was impressed with how he dealt with haye's rushes. While haye hasn't got brilliant footwork either he is very quick about the ring but wlad managed to get out of range most of the time. it may have been in little hops and bounds at times but it was his foot speed that enabled him to get out.

    My point about the right hand isn't so much about speed, it's more to do with how straight a shot wlad's right is. He feints quite a bit with it, then the opponent being focused on the jab combined with WK's hand speed and how straight the shot is makes it tricky to see coming. Lennox's right was more of an overhand right at times and sometimes he looped it a bit.
     
  6. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,602
    Jul 22, 2004
  7. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    Did Lennox beat you when you been kid?
    Lennox had typical British chin ... a glassed one
    Wlad never went down as hard so he couldn't get up.
     
  8. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    90
    Jul 19, 2004
    You are so horribly wrong, that it's obvious there is no point in discussing.
     
  9. Ayatollah

    Ayatollah ESB's Godliest poster Full Member

    6,196
    3,593
    May 13, 2005
    Why Widdow? Please elaborate
     
  10. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    Wlad has a better work rate, footwork, and stamina

    both had and equally powerful jab and right hand

    at everything else Lewis is on top
     
  11. Jimbob

    Jimbob Active Member Full Member

    1,142
    1
    Mar 14, 2009
    Don't bother wasting your time, the general forum is 90% **** filled with ******s.

    Unless you think that Wlad and Vitali are an unbeatable super-humans and the greatest fighters ever, then you are hater. It is that simple with these morons.
     
  12. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,766
    Jul 21, 2009
    Some points you didn't mention at all:

    1. Diet between fights? How disciplined was Lennox vs. Wlad? Clear advantage for Wlad. True dedication 365 days a year. Lennox lost that attitude thanks to his arrogance and cockiness.
    2. Workrate? Oftentimes Lennox fell asleep during fights or got careless. Advantage for Wlad who is busy and concentrated every second of every round.
    3. Ability to make a fight dirty. Clear advantage for Lennox here IMO. Wlad lacks a street fighting credibility that sometimes is needed in pro boxing. He makes up for it with his semi-illegal 'jab & push down' move.
    4. Cockiness, which is a double-edged sword. It can help you and it can destroy you. Lennox (rightfully) underestimated guys like Grant or Golotha. However it almost backfired vs. Briggs and Vitali. Wlad doesn't do that (anymore). He'll overestimate even the worst bum. I'll give the advantage to Wlad here, just from a professional point of view.
     
  13. Vergilius

    Vergilius Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,220
    3
    May 29, 2010
    I'd say you are wrong on some counts and also forgetting a few: Wlad's an inch or so taller and a slightly more dedicated professionel - we haven't seen him come in out of shape as Lewis did occasionally.

    Let me state that I would agree Lewis is the overall better fighter and Wlad most likely won't surpass him because there are no great fighters out there for him to beat.

    I do think Wladimir has more athletic talent, better balance and better movement (Steward has said words to that effect - even though he also believes Lewis is slightly superior overall).

    I think the power is equal, and I didn't think Lennox was more exciting - he just had some better opponents.

    Lewis' real advantage over Wlad is one of mentality. Even though his chin wasn't great, Lennox wasn't gunshy and when the going got tough - he got going. Wladimir showed in the first Peter fight that he can battle through adversity - but not like Lewis who had a warrior's heart. I think Lewis would win a prime H2H encounter because of his determination - but I don't think it would be easy for him and an upset could occur.
     
  14. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,602
    Jul 22, 2004
    Lennox underestimated Golota???
     
  15. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,043
    2,852
    Nov 6, 2011
    Great points however I think if Lewis were to have carried on after vitali he'd never underestimate an opponent again. Who do you see as having the better chin?