Spider Kelly's Opinion Of Jim Jeffries

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Mar 5, 2012.

  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    98,494
    Likes Received:
    30,308
  2. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2011
    Messages:
    6,976
    Likes Received:
    2,242
    seems to round up his failings quite well
     
  3. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,359
    Likes Received:
    311
    Thanks, McVey!

    Always good to get contemporary views of Jeffries.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    114,700
    Likes Received:
    51,539
    I have a very similar one about Johnson somewhere, weirdly, but it's just a random newspaper writer. 1908 was the date.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    98,494
    Likes Received:
    30,308
    I thought Kelly was rather harsh myself ,its just for interest ,I am sure there are as many positive opinions from Jeffries contemporaries.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    114,700
    Likes Received:
    51,539
    Yeah, just like Johnson.

    The one I have is more about his resume. It states (ridiculously) that Johnson isn't qualified to challenge for Burns title. It is interesting though, that both had very harsh critics even in their pomps.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    98,494
    Likes Received:
    30,308
    Neither was seen as a particularly dynamic performer, Jeffries was cautious,Johnson ultra cautious. I find Johnson boring to watch .If you paid to watch him under -perform ,as he frequently appears to have done ,I doubt you would become his fan
    .He was on a guarantee against O Brien, and cynically exploited the rules of the contest , basically pissing on his public.