Im not mad and that post wasn't intended to "disprove" you're flawed and useless points/opinions....it was intended to prove how worthless you are as a boxing fan and as a poster.
david haye is a perfumed flower soft and weak typical brit all talk nothing to back it up with. Now the Polish adamek is a plugger little talent and dumb looking but tries hard and doesn't give up. adamek can with this fight. haye will talk adamek will rumble.
United Kingdom <14cm Poland > 14cm deal with it, get over Adamek :hi: This content is protected United Kingdom <14cm Poland > 14cm deal with it, get over Adamek :hi:
Faeruns value as a human beeing is not the subject of this thread. For such debates please to the lounge. And he is right in his argumentation. Haye would slaughter Adamek. He gave the superior Klitschko sibling a fight, while Adamek was trashed by the slow grandpa Vitali.
Everything i said in those 2 quoted posts was correct, apart from my prediction, but then no one could have predicted both Waldo and Haye being awful that night and of course the toe injury
not a bad fight really. It helps Haye stay sharp and Adamek might make it competitive. I think Haye would win a decision. But it would not be onesided.
Funny, I see Adamek as a more skilled fighter than Haye. Maybe it's because I'm wrong, or maybe it's because I'm not wearing union-Jack colored glasses. In terms of boxing skill, Haye is off balance and open with his punches. Adamek is technically superior. Haye has advantages in speed, by a little, and power (due to his naturally bigger frame).
haye would knock him out at some point in the fight. Adamek is brave but the outcome would be enevatable. Haye win by KO
So all the drivel you posted was correct except the part that matters :rofl Accept it, son, you don't know **** about boxing.