delete

Ignore me, I should have known it was some obscure ****

 

HoF doesn't mean **** though

 

Too early for this my brains fried

 

Wlad Klitchko?

ot Tyson?

 

atsch Dude, how could it be Klitschko? Six reigning champions! I think it's Tyson. If he's counting Spinks who was still linear at the time then Tyson unified WBC, WBA, IBF and linear one at a time, that's four. Then he came back and beat Bruno and Seldon and that's six. Tyson never lost a decision, he won every decision he got to and his six losses are by knockout or DQ. It's almost certainly him, imo.

 

Slappy head smiley is a bit harsh.
I'm not a klit expert. Just through out a couple of guesse.

 

It was testimant to Tysons attitude. He probably could have lost decisions to Holyfield and DOuglas. it certainly wasn't a chin thing. But the guy just wouldn't stop coming forward till someone was Knocked out.

 

Sorry. Overexcited Tyson guy here. Also a Wlad fan. And I'm Italian so I slap my forehead all the time in person. I might as well do it online.

 

It is Tyson isn't it. Tucker, Spinks and Biggs being the undefeated fighters.

 

Lewis would be fighter #5.

 

Can't be. Lennox beat three reigning champs that fit. Briggs was linear for whatever that meant at the time. Evander in a unification and Rahman to win the titles back. He was given the WBC title the first time when Bowe refused to face him as the number one challenger. That's it.

 

I'd like to go to sleep some time, Boxed.

 

I knew it! Thank you for not waiting me out to be a dirty sadistic Russkie, as per usual. Good thread. Good night.

 

Sweet. What do I win?

 

:yikes