Marquez Defeating Pacquiao DOES NOT Indicate Pac Loses to Floyd- A Technical Summary

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Bogotazo, Nov 13, 2011.


  1. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    WTF? This has nothing to do with FMJ you idiot.

    Styles make fights. JMM is an elite counter puncher with average physical attributes. His amazing ring IQ allows him to function at this level. His average physical attributes gets him caught and dropped. Regularly. FMJ is everything JMM is x10. Same IQ with the physical attributes to match.

    You idiot. This is Boxing. Speed and timing are quite specific. Pac isn't "mobile". If he was so "mobile" why in the hell couldn't he catch JMM or better yet shot to hell Shane Mosely? I will tell you why, he NEEDS a basic come forward fighter to get his shots off. As soon as a guy adds a layer of intelligence? Pac is confused.

    You can be nothing other than a ******* not seeing how a JMM problem becomes a FMJ catastrophe. The reach, speed, and killer straight right spell utter disaster. Or does your dumb ass think Pac is now known to dodge punches like that sneaky right hand of FMJ? :lol:

    On your feminine "no fighter is perfect" comment, this is Boxing. Anything can happen. Looking at the facts though? Pac has a snowballs' chance in a blast furnace. I hate Pac and I still have him winning the last fight. You dork. :lol:
     
  2. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    Apologies, I meant 2009:good
     
  3. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    Height and reach are underrated factors in this fight. The way Floyd defends makes it ridiculously hard to hit him if his opponent is shorter than him. Look at the Marquez fight, look at the Hatton fight, the Chavez fight: shorter fighters with small reaches don't land on him and he makes them look silly. Show me one noteworthy punch a fighter under 5'7" with less than a 70" reach has landed on him.
     
  4. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,134
    Oct 17, 2009
    Lead foot positioning was key to Marquez's success, and it requires consistent lateral movement, which Floyd often neglects. I've boxed for years myself, so you don't need to act like you're a genius when you're not providing anything insightful and don't have a response to the facts already presented in this thread.

    "FMJ is everything JMM is x10." This simply isn't true and is one of the most idiotic things you could say. As you say, "this is boxing", and in boxing, styles and the way fighters apply their physical attributes are more important than these factors by themselves. If you're vulnerable to consistently getting caught at a side angle, reach and speed aren't going to bail you out. If you don't think Pacquiao's mobility is what brings him great success, then you simply don't pay attention.

    When you can somehow rationalize that ceding lead foot positioning against someone with the speed and power of Manny's left hand isn't a liability and hasn't made Floyd look more vulnerable than he should given his athleticism and Ring IQ in the past, then come back. Otherwise, be on your way happily sucking Floyd's dick. There's no point trying to reason with someone as biased and relentlessly defensive of Floyd's every breath as yourself. Take tips from a Floyd fan like Leon if you want to be taken seriously.
     
  5. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,134
    Oct 17, 2009
    That's definitely true; against traditional infighters that come forward straight, Floyd's guard is even more effective, which is why the only way Manny will land would be by circling:

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4d5bgBcU3g&feature=player_embedded[/ame]
     
  6. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Really?

    Hey dumbass, how many inches of reach advantage negate any lead food positioning? FMJ's reach negates the foot positioning. Out of position? He can beat him with a jab or hook. In position, he can land the lead right before Pac can answer. Defensively the reach and height pay dividends.

    You have Boxed, but it doesn't seem like you get it.

    It isn't true? So how in the hell did he completely shut him out and have the entire world wondering if JMM should hang up his gloves? The same JMM who went on to beat many top name fighters? Why? He is exponentially better. That is not saying anything negative about JMM.

    Mobility? Where in the hell has he shown you mobility? Every single guy he fights is a flat footed come forward brawler. The guys who used mobility BEAT HIM or survived in fights they were completely out matched in.

    Regardless of lead foot positioning, you can't land a left hand cleanly when you don't have "flinch". Pac isn't a "gotcha" guy. He needs the guy to come at him. FMJ won't do this. FMJ with get within range and stop. Now what? If Pac leads? He gets jabbed or FMJ backs off. If Pac waits? He gets hit. Rinse repeat all fight long. The sad part about it is that in the gif file you use of the fight JMM is INSIDE of Pac's lead foot. Look again idiot.

    How in the hell does a guy have a chance of doing better against a superior counter puncher when he looks horrible versus an inferior one with less reach, size, speed, and timing? How? :lol:
     
  7. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Which way will he circle you dolt?

    He is either circling to FMJ's back or INTO FMJ's right hand. He can't avoid this due to the superior reach AND height.

    The jab is longer. A slight shift to his back foot adds another 3-4 inches of distance further to reach his head. Shift too far left and hello right hand. FMJ steps past Manny's lead foot then either runs past him to reposition or rolls right back onto his rear foot.

    Manny's only chance is if FMJ tries to beat Manny up. Then and only then Manny can land a lucky punch.
     
  8. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    :deal
     
  9. Cableaddict

    Cableaddict Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,705
    292
    Jun 15, 2011
    " Marquez Defeating Pacquiao DOES NOT Indicate Pac Loses to Floyd."

    I agree.


    Pacquiao being exposed as a trumped-up, defenseless puppet Indicates Pac Loses to Floyd.
     
  10. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,134
    Oct 17, 2009
    Pacquiao is mobile if you don't take away his angle. He focuses on either stepping all the way out to the left, or landing and stepping to the right to get away and/or resume his attack. Clottey was not a brawler, Cotto was not a brawler, Barrera was not a brawler, and Manny had success repeating this formula. If he weren't fleet footed and competent at working angles, he would have been stopped by now post-Roach due the flaws in his punching form and guard.

    Whenever Marquez stood in front of Manny without ducking down and getting in Manny's inside due to his relatively similar size (which explains the GIF), he got caught in a similar matter. The lateral movement is key. Floyd is not superior to Marquez in this regard, and it shows in how he handles the likes of Judah and Oscar, fighting in straight lines and giving up the center of the ring consistently. Someone with his Ring IQ and athleticism shouldn't be walking into right hooks from the likes of Ortiz and rushing back into the ropes and shutting down offensively regardless of how cleanly the following shots landed. These habits are a liability. As the author of the article posted highlighted similar points stated, Floyd's back touched the ropes against Ortiz more than JMM's seemed to across all three Pacquiao fights. Floyd can be effective in the pocket against swarmers, but there are times he shuts down when he can't easily gauge what's coming at him and he has no more room to pull back and fire off his usual straight punches.

    You can't compare JMM and Mayweather to how Manny and Mayweather would match up; Marquez is not really a dynamic aggressor, did not transition as well, and his lateral movement specializes defensively, not offensively. No comparison.

    Reach is not a reliable way to compensate for being out of position and being caught at a vulnerable angle. No matter how long the right hand is, Floyd would have to dramatically reach to cross over and land the punch if Pacquiao succeeds in moving to his right. Judah was able to do so using minimal movement, and that movement went from minimal to ineffective once Floyd walked him down, but it took him 5 rounds to effectively pressure Zab. Throwing the left as a lead, counter, and behind a flinging jab is nothing Manny can't replicate. Their styles are not similar, but their use of the same punches are not dissimilar. The right hook counter Zab set up that bears similarity to Manny's illustrates exactly why reach, speed, etc. can't compensate for being out of position:

    Before
    This content is protected

    After
    This content is protected



    I'm not fervently proclaiming that Pacquiao will beat Floyd; I'm simply pointing out dynamics that suggest that the fight will at least be competitive should Pacquiao maximize his dimensions and exploit Floyd's few weaknesses, so you can stop obsessively insulting me and ruining a thread that had a great few pages of thoughtful and respectful exchanges. If you're looking to battle with *******s with no knowledge of the sport, go somewhere else.
     
  11. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    You just contradicted yourself. First you say that we can't compare Mayweather and Marquez, who fight at least somewhat similarly in that they are both superb counter punchers. Then you go on to compare Judah and Pacquiao who fight TOTALLY different. Judah is a patient, low output type of guy, while Pacquiao is a high output aggressive fighter who leaves himself exposed more often. Also, Judah is taller than Pac with a better reach.

    As for lead foot position, some right handed fighters (I think this applies to Mayweather) intentionally circle to the left of a southpaw because from that position it is easier to land the straight counter right hand (Antonio Tarver mentioned this on a recent showtime broadcast as well). This is clearly what Floyd was doing against Ortiz (Who doesn't have a great left hand anyways). When a reporter asked Floyd if he had any advice to give to Berto for his rematch with Ortiz, He said that Ortiz squares up when he throws his straight left and that's when you can hit him with the counter right hand. So it's not simply a matter of him neglecting to circle to a southpaw's right, he knows what he's doing and does it on purpose.

    Out of curiosity, if they do fight what's your prediction?
     
  12. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    I'll answer this for the OP because it's written all over the place.

    He wasn't comparing Pac and Judah as a package.
    He was highlighting two things:

    1. Pac can setup the right hook and lead left behind jabs like Judah, and which Judah had some success with and;
    2. No amount of reach advantage can compensate for improper lead foot positioning, whether forced or by mistake.

    It doesn't matter if it was Judah or Ortiz or some cab driver. It was all about the dynamics of how they fight and how it mixes up with the other fighter's style.
     
  13. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,134
    Oct 17, 2009
    You misunderstand me; I meant that you can't compare the Mayweather-Marquez fight to a Mayweather-Pacquiao fight because JMM and Manny are nothing alike; you can certainly compare the two counter-punchers. Pacquiao and Judah have important differences, but the reason I bring up lead foot positioning in that fight is that Judah is being very simplistic in his approach to those early rounds. Pacquiao has a range of volume, and can throw single shots, short combinations of 1-3 punches, or try for one of his long strings of explosive shots. The reach is a factor, but Pac's feet are much springier, and he can step into a 1-2 as fast as Judah can pop it out, I feel. Lead lefts to the body, 1-1-2's upstairs, a counter right hook upstairs, a lead left in between the high guard or past the shoulder, right hooks to the body...all things we've seen Pac do himself. Pac's upper body rhythm and footwork are also better and could potentially allow him to get himself into those positions more often. I'm not sure how much he's slowed down though at this point; hard to tell how much the speed will help him.

    Also, you're right about Ortiz's dominant hand, but he's done this against Mitchell, Corely, and Judah as well. He circles to the left in the early rounds, and tries to duck down as if they were orthodox fighters ready to throw left hooks. Though he stopped Mitchell fairly easily once he closed the distance, there were long stretches in the early rounds where Floyd would just follow him as he circled to the right, and caught him with a few shots I wouldn't expect from an orthodox fighter of the same caliber. It's the calculation Floyd puts into his shots when he leads that I think give that split second of a pause necessary to get the angle on him.

    As far as a prediction goes, I used to favor Pacquiao via competitive decision, but that was really post-Cotto; I'll have to wait until the Bradley fight to see how committed Manny still is after his last two bad outings, which I don't yet see any reason to attribute to being "old" or "shot".

    :good

    Would you like to take over any further questions that have answers already written in previous pages for a bit? I assume there will be many more, and I have **** to do. It takes time defending such arguments for 42 pages virtually alone.
     
  14. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    I have a strong opinion that Floyd will have less trouble with Pacquaio than he did with Judah for those 4/5 rounds.
     
  15. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,134
    Oct 17, 2009
    I simply have to disagree. I can see how there was a distinct sense of timing Judah was employing Manny doesn't seem to use, but a lot of the punches used were so basic and set up so simply. Unless Manny has slipped or has had his hand-speed slowed down considerably, I see him doing at least as well, and not being half as complaint to Floyd's pressure.