I get it. You want other people who agree with you to step in and have a circle jerk. Hopefully for you the serious people will leave now.
Once again you fail to see the crux of the matter.Quit apologizing for Floyd...it is what it is. Dude was never serious about a Pac fight.
Clearly, nor was the other party involved. My point is you shouldn't have to exaggerate and make up ****ing bull**** to get that point across. If this fight ever does come through, the fighters will not be coming away with anywhere close to $150 million, and that's just one of several flat out fallacies in that stupid ass article. :deal
pac offered 50/50 and floyd rejected that. he instead offered pac a flat fee with no PPVs. how can you *****s say it's a fair offer?
Where did I say it was a "fair" offer? Exactly. Now shut the **** up and stop trying to lump me in with your kind, you delusional fanboy ****** ass *****. :hi:
****ing ****** ass Pacturd with 3rd grade reading comprehension skills posting his idiotic opinions on **** he has no ****ing clue about.
****ing imbecile. Grawl out of your homo cave and see the light instead of Pacmans ****. Damn tweeb ass *******s. Every time you threaten them with a serious question they just ignore it. ****** !
No you still miss the point. You're so busy latching on to some ambiguous tacit detail that was only meant to be a supportive talking point. The main premise in so many words is: Pac's camp was serious as shown by their actions in moving to the middle, whereas Floyd's camp was not by moving out further. Don't talk as if you recognize what logical fallacies are when you're the one making the obvious one (strawman, if you want the outright philosophical term). If you're trying to prove that Pac is EQUALLY at fault, then don't ***** about potentially inaccurate guesstimates that has nothing to do with the actual argument. You could, however, attempt to show that Pac is talking outta of his ass,...which you really can't coz ...well I already explained that to you yesterday.
We've been over this already. Like I said before, if YOU want to assign "more blame" to one of the two idiotic ****ing lying ass parties involved in this nonsense then be my guest. The fact still remains both of these ****ing clowns have flat out lied and contradicted themselves several times throughout this entire ordeal and one doesn't excuse the other no matter how much you'd like it to.
My man, it's your actions that define what you are. It's what you do that actually matters when evaluating your role in whatever conflict. In this case, if one side is doing all the compromising, whilst the other is not...then that's how you should weigh blame on why this fight hasn't happened.