So JMM got robbed by Pac III and Floyd was the rightful victor against Castillo I?

but but, the commentators said uhhmm Juanma was winning, the judges even had him ahead they are next to the ring and can see better, we go by the scorecard, refs don't lie, there is no robberies in boxing....also only by viewing the fight in super slow mo hd can you see juanma was clearly winning, if it wasn't for that stupid gambler ref or foot stomping by salido juanma would have won oh and don't forgot those cramps juanma had to!

 

FMJ-Castillo I was a very close fight, but I don't think Castillo won. Hearsay fuels most of the "Castillo won" thoughts. JMM, however, did box the **** out of Pacquiao every single time the fought, and especially the third time.

 

:deal

 

This content is protected

look guys Katsidis actually won the fight...

 

Thats not after katsidis fight.

 

Just like Martinez won verus Paul the first time, yeah, right.

There's a difference between a close fight and a robbery.

Marquez should have stepped it up a notch if he wanted to seal the deal, Salido knew how to win a fight that he wasn't supposed to win by knocking his opponent out. Marquez was fighting to not end up on the canvas, fought to not lose, handed it over to some pencil pushin judges, and people want to dis Pac? Fight for a win, not to squeak out a decison.

 

:rofl

 

Compubox, the tool of the boxing illiterate.

 

We don't need to watch fights no more, just wait for the compubox numbers to come out to prove a winner.

 

Floyd did not win Castillo 1 i scored it a draw, JMM beat Pac there is no doubt about it.

 

:deal

 

Had JMM win the 3rd and Floyd beat Castillo in the 1st