"In 2010, Anderson was cleared of the attempted murder with a hammer of a drug dealer when witnesses failed to turn up at court." Frank is trying to frame Anderson so that Groves has an excuse not to fight him. It's the perfect crime. :blood
Was about to read the article before I realised who had published it and decided that I'd rather not be filling my head with Bull**** lies and right wing, slyly racist propaganda.
If I was anderson i would be onto the solicitors about the reference to a crime of which he was aquited, as the Sun seems to believe these incidents are connected in some way
What are they going to do. It says he was cleared and doesn't explicitly state any relevance, it's only relevance by location. You can't sue someone for stating facts.
its called implication and inference. article mentions threat against groves. article mentions andersons gripes against groves for cancelling fight. article then mentions andersons previous of which he was aquited. The relevance is that in this context, it had no relevance.
George groves has recently signed for a certain promoter. He is threatened to be shot. Whats Terry Marsh up to recently?
Typical Sun sensationalism..... Lets presume there really was a call And that the caller was Scottish ..... Being shot in the ring could have a whole different meaning...
Hardly a force Bryn. It's 2 of them http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ginger-Defence-League-GDL/124337634267752