Bernard Hopkins or Floyd Mayweather, who has a better resume?

Since when did you get bonus points for fights you lost. Jheeze zab judah must be ATG by now

 

I think he counting bernard facing a prime roy jones as bonus points on his resume.

 

:rofl i luv that. Its how you can tell youre dealing with a noob.

 

Who the hell has been more consistent than Mayweather?

I won't argue much with this, we'll leave it be.

How tested was Winky at LHW? Answer, he had no experience there and had every physical disadvantage as well. In fact, the size difference between Hopkins and Wright was greater than that of Marquez and Mayweather.

I never said they were on par with Pavlik, but the Hatton win was not only par, but ahead of Pavlik.

Your card means nothing. It was a close fight that Hopkins lost. It's not like the Whitaker/Chavez fight were one guy clearly schooled the other and didn't get the W.

When the hell did I compare those wins to Tito? You're making **** up now.

Even though I never made this claim, but they sure as hell do. Johnson has made a career out of losing to mediocre fighters. Beating Tarver does not change that.

Well, I really don't with much you've said, but we all have our opinions. That's what's great about this forum.

 

let's make this simple. just name me a floyd win or opponent which is better or greater than trinidad?

also can you tell us a a floyd opponent which is close to greatness of roy jones and to a lesser extent calzaghe?

 

Bernard lost to ****ing roy jones you idiot:rofl

If you are counting the shot to **** roy jones that he beat, then I guess Danny Williams can count beating Mike Tyson to or Trevor Berbick can count his win against Ali. :rofl

 

Name me a win on Wlad's resume that is better than a prime Mike Tyson? By your logic, Buster Douglas has a better resume than Wlad. Surely you must realize the problem with your line of thinking.

Hopkins lost to these guys. I'm not sure why you don't get that losing efforts don't add to your resume. The next time you interview for a job I want you to tell them about a great company that you applied for before and didn't get the job. Let me know if that boosts your credentials.

 

so you mean bhop would not get resume points for having a close fight with calzaghe (some even have him winning)?

resume is all about opponents and the risk you took. you could be undefeated like floyd but it doesn't mean much if you don't have great opponents. people would credit bhop more for his lost to jones that floyd's win over let's say someone like ortiz. of course you won't get it since for you, all wins are the same no matter what.

 

juan manuel marquez. Titos best win at middleweight. Joppy. Marquez best win at welterweight Pacquiao.

[/quote]also can you tell us a a floyd opponent which is close to greatness of roy jones and to a lesser extent calzaghe?[/QUOTE]

Jeff Lacy fought Roy Jones and Calzaghe. I guess hes greater then Floyd! ****ing clown.:rofl

 

This is getting beyond ridiculous. All of a sudden we're giving guys credit for losing? Another guy touts Ornelas as a way to boost Hopkins' resume? I don't understand what's going on.

 

So by having one biggest win on a resume is the final nail in the coffin for defining someone resume. Everything after doesn't matter.

Jheeze I guess Junior Jones is an ATG, what about that guy who beat the fighter of the decade what's his name they been a couple of them?

 

so you can't? are you even equating bhop's resume to douglas as floyd is to wlad?

resume is also taking risk against greater opponents. BHOP's UD loss to jones would mean much more than most of floyd's wins over contenders.

 

You forgot Hopkins schooled Winky!

 

also can you tell us a a floyd opponent which is close to greatness of roy jones and to a lesser extent calzaghe?[/QUOTE]

Jeff Lacy fought Roy Jones and Calzaghe. I guess hes greater then Floyd! ****ing clown.:rofl[/QUOTE]

:rofl

 

Stop while your behind idiot.