Kell Brook vs. Tommy Hearns at WW

Poor Hearns...

 

Now now:nono
Let's keep it real.
We all know Tommy struggled with slickness.:bart

 

Feather Fisted Matthew Hatton stunned him, Hearns quite possibly could have killed him.

 

Hope would outbox Hearns. Too slick. Too Welsh.

 

Blueprint = Hearns right hand.

 

There. Is. No. Blue. Print.

Special K cracks that china chin code.

 

You guys are freaking crazy who think that Brooks could Handle hears.. Hearn was a solid boxer, Long jab, under rated hook to the body, and a right hand needs not introduction.. You fools better wait till this kid makes his mark first before you start talking that ****. Brook is not Leonard or Hagler , both almost met their end at the hands of The Hit man .. Second Hearn was stopped only once at welter and it was on his feet.

 

If fights still went 15 rounds Brook would KO him in the 13th.

 

This content is protected

 

Soooooo you're going with Hearns?

 

I gotta go with Brook. Hearns couldn't even beat SRL. How could he beat a better, more athletic, version of Leonard in the form of Special K?

 

I don't think he's sure at this point. He made a good point, Hagler and Leonard are not Brook, they're a level below and Hearns couldn't get passed either!

 

I really hope this thread and some of the posts in it are trying to be funny or something by saying brook would beat hearns

if it isn't....you people must be smoking some potent ****

 

Matthew Hatton had Brook on ***** St. without change for the bus, but Hearns is no Matthew Hatton.