Technically i wouldn't reccommend starting out with Mauy Thai if you wanna become a boxer. The mechanics and what you're looking out for are just different. The main thing that will suffer is your defense. Because you're coming from using your legs to attack as well as your whole positioning is different to that of boxing. You're aligning your torso different,, you sqaure up a lot more. Sometimes your offense suffers too. Because you're not ganna be as refined as someone who is used to practicising and using only their hands all their life, while you've been using your hands AND your legs. So you're punching technique might not be as good. Elbows might be too far out. You become more open to bodyshots when you turn to boxing. Most Muay Thai guys will be taught to have their guard stuck right up to their face, which is a bad thing to do in boxing sometimes because you're blinding yourself. The Muay Thai stance doesn't allow you to fight off centre and be loosy, goosy because they're watching out for kicks and not just punches. It's totally different mechanics. I just wouldn't get someone who intends to become a boxer, not start with boxing, do you get what i mean? It's like a tennis player starting off playing table tennis or having someone wanting to become a bastketball player doing a similar but in some ways totally different sport. I hope that makes sense, because i appreciate it's not the best examples there. lol It does sometimes just depend on the quality of trainer though. Sometimes going to a Muay Thai gym with a good trainer is better than going to a boxing gym with a very bad one. Anyway, good luck with it, mate. I have nothing against Muay Thai in general. 'Staunchly' might be a little extreme, Flea. But, yeah. I'm definitely not for you starting your career out in that field if you wanna become a boxer. I just think fundamentally you pick up too many bad habits. Which might be hard to fix. I know some would disagree.
The thing is while you will learn proper punch technique you will also pick up bad habits, in terms of boxing, such as incorrect stance. I suppose its detrimental effect will depend on how adaptable you are.
of course its detrimental. i have trained at a few thai boxing gyms. and most cant box. they may be able to throw punches but there ius no real slips, couinters etc. and the reason for this is that the thai shin, knees and elbows are devastating strikes. 1 mistake and you are koed. doesnt encourage boxing, encourages a rigid guard and very very basic boxing. imo. thai guys are v wel conditioned and hard tho!
I would say that of you're a Thai who has trained in Thai gyms since the age of 8-11 then you will be technically astute, composed, experienced and with an awkward, but well-tuned boxing style. Thai's are expected to be good enough to be able to compete in Muay Thai or International boxing. It is no coincidence so many Thai's have attained a high level of success in boxing in just a few fights. Okay, not everyone is turning over and dominating the sport. But I would say there have been enough Muay Thai converts bred and taught by the Thai masters such as Kru Yodtong that it would lend to it's credibility as a breeding ground for a top level boxer. Over here? Nah, it seems more the Dutch style thing, which is effective but not a patch on Nak Muay from the homeland. But it will give you something else to defend yourself with, so I'd recommend it, only done a few classes before but taking an introductory course at a local gym soon to get myself reacquainted with some basics, before training in Thailand before the end of the year. I'm over there enough Did you see that clip of Samart's defence I posted for you in some thread or other Slip?
Nah, not seen that, mate. Anyway, however bad the amateur system is right now i still wouldn't advise someone to go the Muay Thai route before a boxing career. I agree the training has a lot to do with it and the Muay Thai in Europe is kind of a bootleg version. But If you're ganna box then just box. That's my view. Repetition is the key to learning and mastering something.
I think the main flaws for a Muay Thai fighter in terms of their potential boxing ability is the tendency to square up, and typically a high but open guard. Here's a few fights from a local show.... [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycrgW_w7T74&feature=relmfu[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWAx6wnBCUQ&feature=relmfu[/ame]
Was anyone else really intrigued by Martinez/Macklin technically? I thought it was a quality fight with so many little things going on and really good to look at technically. Macklin kind of showed things he's never shown before. He really surprised me in those early rounds. Now, Martinez was trying to figure him out and getting into things but Macklin at least gave him things to THINK about and gave himself the best chance. I love the adjustment Martinez made to land his left hand...The best compliment you can pay Macklin is that he brought out the best in Martinez. I really enjoyed watching that fight from a technical stand point. Sometimes people just wanna see the end result and don't appreciate how things get there. James McGirt Sr. really layed out a very good gameplan for Macklin. He realised the more you lead and throw against Martinez the more chances you present him. So he had him circling well, getting his foot positioning right and feinting to set up his punches. I really want people to watch what Macklin was doing in those early rounds because it gets lost with what happened in the end. That's how you beat Martinez! McGirt also really relaxed his guard and improved his footwork. Whatever he did it wasn't ganna be good enough because he was just the significantly weaker horse in the race, but he at least gave us a really intriguing fight. I liked the way he would feint, never thought i'd see that from Macklin. He'd keep Martinez guessing and then as Martinez was stepping out throw a right hand to the body and head. How many people thought Macklin could really THINK and execute it for as long as he did against someone as good as Martinez. His problem was he wasn't good enough to stay with Martinez, once Sergio stepped up the gears. He also couldn't keep up with him in the exchanges as Martinez has such a HUGE speed advantage on him. He got mentally and physically drained as the fight went on and Martinez started reading his positioning. Sometimes thinking THAT much and fighting such a savy, celebral fight can be mentally draining. Because you're thinking all the time and trying to anticipate. Also his punch imagination and release was never ganna be good enough and so he was ganna become more and more predictable as the fight went on, defensively AND offensively. If you notice he couldn't follow up the right hands with a left hook.
very good breakdown slip. macklin showed hes got something about him. If only he had a bit more power. Id have liked to see him step to his left more and also to develop himself not to become square on after throwing the right hand, because it was killing him in this fight (granted martinez is exceptional at judging distance for his left hand)
Yep, he was crossing over with the right hand. Also he could only avoid the left hand one way and only getting into one position. Once Martinez figured out how to land it he couldn't miss. He would slightly lower it, in the beginning he would try and hit Macklin directly, but Macklin would make a little movement to his left or backwards and was avoiding it. But what Martinez did was he started to place the left hand not directly where Macklin's head would start, but where it would finish up after he made the movement. Great adjustment! I hope the Barker fight happens. I think Macklin beats Barker, who's a little too straight up. Maybe even stops him.
European kickboxing is derived from kyokushin karate rather than Muay Thai. The knees and elbows are something they came to much later, and thus the top guys like Ramon Dekkers ended up going to Thailand to train further in the art. The clinch is limited in K-1, which is where the Dutch have had most of their success. The footage in Rhino's clip just isn't a high enough quality IMO. As mentioned before, real Muay Thai is taught in Thailand, and i think it gives the fighters, more often than not, a solid grounding (very technical sport) whereas the kinda' stuff you see above, is not being taught by the same level of teacher. It's sub-standard by the standards of even lower-level Thai fights. Check out some Samart Payakaroon or Somluck Khamsing Muay Thai fights (or a highlight package, sorry I can't post, on iPhone but there's some good and easy accessible ones on YouTube) and then consider that Samart continued being a defensive whiz and quality puncher as a boxer, and Khamsing won the Gold at Atlanta! After years as a top Muay Thai fighter, he won Thailand's first Gold, beating Philip NDou. (and Floyd was in his division that year!) So it shows that Muay Thai trainers can adapt to both a hard hitting pro' style and a different animal in the amateur game. In comparison, Saensak Muangsurin had no skill whatsoever But was hardened and a devastating enough puncher to do what he did. There are many examples of quality Thai converts. It's about the teacher, rather than the background itself IMO. I find it highly unlikely there are any Muay Thai geniuses knocking around the UK.